Hübsch P, Kocanda H, Youssefzadeh S, Schneider B, Kainberger F, Seidl G, Kurtaran A, Gruber S
Department of Radiology, Vienna University, Austria.
Acta Radiol. 1992 Sep;33(5):477-81.
Measurements of bone mineral density (BMD) of the proximal femur (including femoral neck, Ward's triangle and trochanteric region) were compared with the Singh index grading in 40 normal subjects (20 male, 20 female) and in 116 patients (18 male, 98 female) referred for assessment of possible osteoporosis. Additionally, the BMD and the Singh index of 12 cadaver specimens (6 male, 6 female) of the proximal femur were compared with each other and with the histomorphology of the femoral necks of the specimens. Although there was a good correlation of Singh index with BMD in the group of male patients with suspected osteoporosis and in the series of bone specimens, there was a poor correlation in the group of female patients as well as in the normal controls and in the patient population as a whole. There was also poor correlation of Singh index values with histomorphologic data, whereas the BMD measurements correlated well with the amount of calcified bone found histologically in the femoral necks of the bone specimens. We conclude that the Singh index cannot be used to predict BMD of the proximal femur accurately.
对40名正常受试者(20名男性,20名女性)以及116名因可能患有骨质疏松症而前来接受评估的患者(18名男性,98名女性)的股骨近端(包括股骨颈、Ward三角和转子区)骨密度(BMD)测量值与Singh指数分级进行了比较。此外,还对12例股骨近端尸体标本(6例男性,6例女性)的骨密度和Singh指数进行了相互比较,并与标本股骨颈的组织形态学进行了比较。尽管在疑似骨质疏松症的男性患者组和一系列骨标本中,Singh指数与骨密度有良好的相关性,但在女性患者组以及正常对照组和整个患者群体中,相关性较差。Singh指数值与组织形态学数据的相关性也较差,而骨密度测量值与骨标本股骨颈组织学上发现的钙化骨量相关性良好。我们得出结论,Singh指数不能准确用于预测股骨近端的骨密度。