NELSON G S, PESTER F R
Bull World Health Organ. 1962;27(4-5):473-81.
Although it is recognized that the presence of animal filariae can lead to confusion in the interpretation of infection rates in mosquito vectors of filariasis, the filariae found in man-biting simuliids are usually assumed to be Onchocerca volvulus. The authors of this paper emphasize that it is unwise to calculate transmission indices from infection rates in man-biting simuliids unless there is confidence in the identification of the filarial larvae. In this respect they cite their observations on Mount Elgon in Uganda which show that the majority of the filarial larvae in Simulium neavei-the local vector of onchocerciasis-are of species that do not affect man.To assist in the correct interpretation of infection rates in the vectors the authors made a detailed study of the morphological character of O. volvulus infective larvae and established criteria for distinguishing O. volvulus from other filariae known to be transmitted by simuliids.
尽管人们认识到动物体内的丝虫可能会给丝虫病蚊媒感染率的解读带来混淆,但在叮人蚋体内发现的丝虫通常被认为是盘尾丝虫。本文作者强调,除非对丝虫幼虫的鉴定有把握,否则根据叮人蚋的感染率来计算传播指数是不明智的。在这方面,他们引用了在乌干达埃尔贡山的观察结果,这些观察结果表明,盘尾丝虫病当地病媒纳氏蚋体内的大多数丝虫幼虫属于不感染人类的物种。为了帮助正确解读病媒的感染率,作者对盘尾丝虫感染性幼虫的形态特征进行了详细研究,并确立了区分盘尾丝虫与已知由蚋传播的其他丝虫的标准。