Orimo S, Taniguchi A, Ichikawa T, Hiyamuta E, Tamaki M
Department of Neurology, Kanto Teishin Hospital.
Rinsho Shinkeigaku. 1992 Apr;32(4):412-5.
Two patients in a family of exertion-induced heat stroke were reported. Case 1: A 23-year-old male, paternal cousin of case 2, was admitted to our hospital because of loss of consciousness during running under a burning sun. On physical and neurological examinations, he was deeply comatose with high fever, tachycardia, and increased deep tendon reflexes. Laboratory findings disclosed rhabdomyolysis, acute renal failure, disseminated intravascular coagulation, liver injury, and brain edema. He recovered after intensive cooling, some antibiotics, glycerol and sodium dantrolene administration. Case 2: A 19-year-old male experienced loss of consciousness and high fever during playing soccer at 15 years of age, and was admitted to a hospital. On admission, he had high fever of 38.7 degrees C, and increased serum CK level. He recovered two weeks after admission. He was readmitted to our hospital to evaluate the predisposition for malignant hyperthermia. His physical and neurological examinations showed no abnormalities. Routine laboratory findings were within normal limits. Muscle biopsy findings of cases 1 and 2 were mildly increased number of fibers with centrally placed nuclei. Caffeine test on skinned muscle fibers from the biopsies showed normal response in both type 1 and 2 fibers. The present patients were diagnosed as having exertion-induced heat stroke, but with no increased muscle fiber sensitivity to caffeine, suggesting that the pathomechanism differs from that of malignant hyperthermia induced by malfunction of sarcoplasmic reticulum.
报道了一个劳力性热射病家族中的两名患者。病例1:一名23岁男性,病例2的堂兄,因在烈日下跑步时失去意识而入住我院。体格检查和神经检查发现,他深度昏迷,伴有高热、心动过速和深腱反射增强。实验室检查结果显示有横纹肌溶解、急性肾衰竭、弥散性血管内凝血、肝损伤和脑水肿。经过强化降温、使用一些抗生素、甘油和丹曲林钠治疗后,他康复了。病例2:一名19岁男性在15岁踢足球时出现意识丧失和高热,被收治入院。入院时,他体温高达38.7℃,血清肌酸激酶水平升高。入院两周后康复。他再次入住我院以评估恶性高热的易感性。他的体格检查和神经检查均未发现异常。常规实验室检查结果在正常范围内。病例1和病例2的肌肉活检结果显示,中央核纤维数量轻度增加。对活检获得的皮肤肌肉纤维进行咖啡因试验,结果显示1型和2型纤维反应均正常。目前这两名患者被诊断为劳力性热射病,但肌肉纤维对咖啡因的敏感性并未增加,这表明其发病机制与肌浆网功能障碍引起的恶性高热不同。