Cohen L
Department of Anthropology, Harvard University.
Cult Med Psychiatry. 1992 Jun;16(2):123-61. doi: 10.1007/BF00117016.
This paper develops a critique of international gerontology through an ethnography and analysis of gerontological practice in India. The central theme of Indian gerontology - that of an imminent demographic and social explosion of an aging population who will tax the country's slender resources - misrepresents available data and fails to signify the experience of most Indian old people. Narrative and deconstructive techniques are deployed to examine the language of crisis and the complex sources of this misrepresentation. Three sources are explored: local disjunctions of class and gender in India, neocolonial biases in the structure of knowledge on aging central to international discourse, and subaltern strategies within India for subverting Western and elite Indian imperatives of what it means to be old. A variety of textual, ethnographic, and historical materials are examined: Indian and American literature pertaining to the 1982 World Assembly on Aging, a series of sociological texts each entitled "Aging in India," and four contemporary Indian institutions designed to meet the needs of old people: a social service agency, a geriatric clinic, a retirement community, and an old age home.
本文通过对印度老年学实践的人种志研究与分析,对国际老年学提出了批判。印度老年学的核心主题——即将到来的老年人口在人口统计学和社会层面的激增将耗尽该国微薄资源——歪曲了现有数据,也未能体现大多数印度老年人的实际情况。本文运用叙事和解构技巧,审视了危机话语以及这种歪曲现象的复杂根源。探讨了三个根源:印度当地阶级与性别的脱节、国际话语中老龄化知识结构里的新殖民偏见,以及印度国内颠覆西方和印度精英阶层关于老年定义的支配性观念的底层策略。研究考察了各种文本、人种志和历史资料:与1982年老龄问题世界大会相关的印度和美国文献、一系列均题为《印度的老龄化》的社会学文本,以及四个旨在满足老年人需求的当代印度机构:一个社会服务机构、一家老年诊所、一个退休社区和一家养老院。