• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

窄带刺激的不对称辨别

Asymmetrical discrimination of narrow-band stimuli.

作者信息

Elliott L L, Hammer M A, Carrell T

机构信息

Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208.

出版信息

J Acoust Soc Am. 1992 Oct;92(4 Pt 1):1919-22. doi: 10.1121/1.405239.

DOI:10.1121/1.405239
PMID:1401536
Abstract

A three-interval, forced-choice procedure that obtained complete psychometric functions was used to study frequency discrimination for 13-item continua of impulse-generated, narrow-band, buzz-like, steady-state sounds. For all subjects and durations, discrimination relative to the highest center frequency (1060 Hz) stimuli was better than discrimination relative to the lowest center frequency (940 Hz). This result is not in consonance with traditional reports of pure tone frequency discrimination and is not readily explained. However, additional experiments with similar stimuli replicated these findings.

摘要

采用一种获得完整心理测量函数的三区间、强制选择程序,来研究脉冲产生的、窄带、嗡嗡样稳态声音的13项连续体的频率辨别。对于所有受试者和时长,相对于最高中心频率(1060赫兹)刺激的辨别优于相对于最低中心频率(940赫兹)刺激的辨别。这一结果与传统的纯音频率辨别报告不一致,且难以解释。然而,使用类似刺激的额外实验重复了这些发现。

相似文献

1
Asymmetrical discrimination of narrow-band stimuli.窄带刺激的不对称辨别
J Acoust Soc Am. 1992 Oct;92(4 Pt 1):1919-22. doi: 10.1121/1.405239.
2
Lateralization of high frequency sounds as a function of interaural amplitude disparity.高频声音的单侧化作为耳间振幅差异的函数。
Can J Exp Psychol. 1995 Sep;49(3):368-75. doi: 10.1037/1196-1961.49.3.368.
3
Discrimination of narrow-band spectra. I: Spectral weights and pitch cues.窄带频谱的辨别。I:频谱权重与音高线索。
J Acoust Soc Am. 1992 Oct;92(4 Pt 1):1911-8. doi: 10.1121/1.405238.
4
Thresholds for segregating a narrow-band from a broadband noise based on interaural phase and level differences.
J Acoust Soc Am. 1991 Feb;89(2):838-44. doi: 10.1121/1.1894644.
5
An auditory Stroop effect for pitch, loudness, and time.
Brain Lang. 1989 May;36(4):592-603. doi: 10.1016/0093-934x(89)90088-6.
6
Monaural loudness adaptation for middle-intensity middle-frequency signals: the importance of measurement technique.
J Gen Psychol. 2001 Oct;128(4):385-99. doi: 10.1080/00221300109598917.
7
Loudness perception and frequency discrimination in subjects with steeply sloping hearing loss: possible correlates of neural plasticity.重度陡降型听力损失患者的响度感知与频率辨别:神经可塑性的可能相关因素
J Acoust Soc Am. 1998 Oct;104(4):2314-25. doi: 10.1121/1.423744.
8
The combination of interaural time and intensity in the lateralization of high-frequency complex signals.高频复合信号定位中双耳时间与强度的组合。
J Acoust Soc Am. 1990 Apr;87(4):1702-8. doi: 10.1121/1.399418.
9
Interaural intensity discrimination: insensitivity at 1000 Hz.
J Acoust Soc Am. 1984 Apr;75(4):1191-4. doi: 10.1121/1.390769.
10
Time course of loudness recalibration: implications for loudness enhancement.响度重新校准的时间进程:对响度增强的影响。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2003 Sep;114(3):1550-6. doi: 10.1121/1.1603768.