Hall J C, Wilson L K, Chapman R A
Department of Environmental Biology, University of Guelph, Ontario.
J Environ Sci Health B. 1992 Oct;27(5):523-44. doi: 10.1080/03601239209372799.
An indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (EIA) for metolachlor (2-chloro-N-(2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl)-N-(2-methoxy-1-methylethyl)acetamid e) detection in river water and soil was developed using serum obtained from rabbits immunized against the acid of metalaxyl ((N-(2,6-dimethylphenyl)-N-(methoxy-acetyl)-DL-alanine methyl ester) conjugated to bovine serum albumin. The assay had a linear working range from 1 to 50 ng/ml with a mean I50 value of 13.6 ng/ml and a lower detection limit of 2.0 ng/ml. Both the mean interwell and interassay coefficients of variation were less than 4% over the range of the standard curves for samples which had been prepared in phosphate buffered saline (PBS), river water, or soil extract. Assay cross-reactivity to the following four structurally related chloro-acetanilide pesticides were: propachlor (0%), metazachlor (0%), alachlor (23%), and metalaxyl (5,000%). Mean recoveries of metolachlor in spiked (2.0 to 32.0 ng/ml range) PBS, river water, and soil extract were 102%, 103%, and 110%, respectively. Soil samples were taken over a 56-d period from field plots treated with metolachlor and analyzed by GC and EIA. The correlation coefficient for comparison of the two methods was 0.96 with the slope of the linear regression line being 0.78. Furthermore, no statistical difference (P less than 0.05) was found between the dissipation curves of metolachlor derived from GC data versus EIA data.
采用针对甲霜灵酸(N-(2,6-二甲基苯基)-N-(甲氧基乙酰基)-DL-丙氨酸甲酯)与牛血清白蛋白偶联物免疫的兔血清,开发了一种用于检测河水和土壤中异丙甲草胺(2-氯-N-(2-乙基-6-甲基苯基)-N-(2-甲氧基-1-甲基乙基)乙酰胺)的间接酶联免疫吸附测定(EIA)方法。该测定的线性工作范围为1至50 ng/ml,平均半数抑制浓度(I50)值为13.6 ng/ml,最低检测限为2.0 ng/ml。在磷酸盐缓冲盐水(PBS)、河水或土壤提取物中制备的样品的标准曲线范围内,平均孔间和批间变异系数均小于4%。该测定对以下四种结构相关的氯代乙酰苯胺类农药的交叉反应性为:扑草净(0%)、异丙草胺(0%)、甲草胺(23%)和甲霜灵(5000%)。在加标(2.0至32.0 ng/ml范围)的PBS、河水和土壤提取物中,异丙甲草胺的平均回收率分别为102%、103%和110%。在56天的时间内,从用异丙甲草胺处理过的田间地块采集土壤样品,并通过气相色谱(GC)和EIA进行分析。两种方法比较的相关系数为0.96,线性回归线的斜率为0.78。此外,在GC数据与EIA数据得出的异丙甲草胺消散曲线之间未发现统计学差异(P小于0.05)。