McFerran M A, Johnson K D
Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-2550.
J Orthop Trauma. 1992;6(3):271-8. doi: 10.1097/00005131-199209000-00001.
Intramedullary nails were placed prospectively in 25 acute femoral shaft fractures in 25 patients without the use of a fracture table. A femoral distractor was used in 21 of the 25 patients to aid in obtaining and holding a reduction. Our goals were to determine if the technique was safe and effective for insertion of intramedullary nails in a wide spectrum of femoral fractures--with no increase in morbidity when compared to the use of the more familiar fracture table--and to determine the potential complications and pitfalls of using this technique. A retrospective evaluation of the most recent 25 patients with 27 femoral fractures that underwent intramedullary nailing on a fracture table was done to compare operative time, estimated blood loss, complications, and postoperative fracture alignment. In addition to the clinical evaluation, cadaveric dissections were undertaken to determine the exact location of the proximal distractor screw in relation to the contents of the femoral triangle. The femoral nerve was a minimum of 2.5 cm, and the femoral artery a minimum of 3.0 cm from the proximal screw. In comparing the two studies, no significant difference was noted in the age of the patients, fracture types or locations, associated injuries, operative time, estimated blood loss, final fracture reduction, or nail position. No complications were encountered in the placement of the proximal femoral distraction screw. Although the distraction method is technically difficult because the reduction is obtained entirely during the procedure, there are certain situations when this technique could be employed with the benefit of decreasing intraoperative patient manipulation, thereby shortening operative time.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
前瞻性地对25例患者的25处急性股骨干骨折在未使用骨折手术台的情况下置入髓内钉。25例患者中有21例使用了股骨撑开器以协助获得并维持骨折复位。我们的目标是确定该技术在广泛的股骨骨折中置入髓内钉是否安全有效——与使用更常见的骨折手术台相比发病率无增加——并确定使用该技术的潜在并发症和陷阱。对最近25例在骨折手术台上接受髓内钉固定的27处股骨骨折患者进行回顾性评估,以比较手术时间、估计失血量、并发症及术后骨折对线情况。除临床评估外,还进行了尸体解剖以确定近端撑开器螺钉相对于股三角内容物的确切位置。股神经距离近端螺钉至少2.5厘米,股动脉距离近端螺钉至少3.0厘米。比较两项研究发现,患者年龄、骨折类型或部位、合并伤、手术时间、估计失血量、最终骨折复位情况或髓内钉位置均无显著差异。在置入股骨近端撑开螺钉时未遇到并发症。尽管撑开方法在技术上有难度,因为复位完全在手术过程中完成,但在某些情况下可采用该技术,其好处是减少术中对患者的操作,从而缩短手术时间。(摘要截短至250字)