Binney A, Addy M, Newcombe R G
Department of Periodontology, Dental School, University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff, UK.
J Periodontol. 1992 Oct;63(10):839-42. doi: 10.1902/jop.1992.63.10.839.
Mouthwashes are frequently used as adjuncts to oral hygiene. However, for some products there is little supportive evidence that rinses provide greater benefits than plain water or additional benefits to the plaque inhibitory action provided by toothpaste. This study was a single blind, randomized, cross-over design in which 6 rinses were compared for inhibitory action against plaque regrowth. The formulations were a cetylpyridinium chloride rinse, a prebrushing detergent rinse, a peroxyborate rinse a toothpaste slurry rinse, a chlorhexidine rinse, and a saline rinse. From a zero baseline, plaque regrowth at day 5 was significantly reduced by chlorhexidine compared to peroxyborate; and, in turn, significantly reduced by peroxyborate compared to the other rinses. There were no significant differences between saline or a toothpaste slurry and the cetylpyridinium chloride or prebrushing rinse products. The findings would appear pertinent to the value of the respective rinses as adjuncts to oral hygiene.
漱口水常被用作口腔卫生的辅助用品。然而,对于某些产品而言,几乎没有支持性证据表明漱口水比清水更有益,或者能为牙膏的牙菌斑抑制作用带来额外益处。本研究采用单盲、随机、交叉设计,比较了6种漱口水对牙菌斑再生长的抑制作用。这些配方分别是西吡氯铵漱口水、刷牙前使用的清洁剂漱口水、过硼酸盐漱口水、牙膏糊剂漱口水、洗必泰漱口水和生理盐水漱口水。从零基线开始,与过硼酸盐相比,第5天时洗必泰显著减少了牙菌斑再生长;反过来,与其他漱口水相比,过硼酸盐又显著减少了牙菌斑再生长。生理盐水或牙膏糊剂与西吡氯铵或刷牙前使用的漱口水产品之间没有显著差异。这些发现似乎与各自漱口水作为口腔卫生辅助用品的价值相关。