Schneider D, Greenberg M R, Choi D
University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick.
J Natl Med Assoc. 1992 Oct;84(10):843-8.
This study investigated the extent to which black public health and political leaders believe that reducing violence should be a national public health priority for black Americans when compared with other public health problems such as acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, low birthweight, and access to health care. A survey asking whether violence in the black community is amendable to change and who (or what institutions) should be responsible for the reduction of violence was sent to 427 black health leaders, 326 black mayors, and 467 black legislators. Three hundred twenty responses were returned. Virtually all respondents placed violence as one of the top five, if not the highest, public health priority for black Americans. Health and political leaders differed in their beliefs about whether violence and violence-related behaviors can be ameliorated, and who should bear responsibility for the reduction of violence. While this survey had limitations, more than 300 black public health and political leaders indicated that violence among black Americans should be made a national public health priority. Policy implications are discussed, and a proactive role for the National Medical Association is advocated.
本研究调查了与诸如获得性免疫缺陷综合征、低出生体重和医疗保健可及性等其他公共卫生问题相比,黑人公共卫生和政治领导人在多大程度上认为减少暴力应该成为美国黑人的一项国家公共卫生优先事项。一项关于黑人社区暴力是否可以改变以及谁(或哪些机构)应该负责减少暴力的调查被发送给427名黑人卫生领导人、326名黑人市长和467名黑人立法者。共收到320份回复。几乎所有受访者都将暴力列为美国黑人公共卫生的五大优先事项之一,如果不是首要优先事项的话。卫生和政治领导人在暴力及与暴力相关行为是否可以改善以及谁应该对减少暴力负责的看法上存在差异。虽然这项调查有局限性,但300多名黑人公共卫生和政治领导人表示,美国黑人中的暴力问题应该成为国家公共卫生优先事项。文中讨论了政策影响,并倡导美国国家医学协会发挥积极作用。