• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Validation of the AI/RHEUM knowledge base with data from consecutive rheumatological outpatients.

作者信息

Bernelot Moens H J

机构信息

Jan van Breemen Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Methods Inf Med. 1992 Sep;31(3):175-81.

PMID:1406331
Abstract

The diagnostic accuracy of AI/RHEUM, an experimental expert system for support in the diagnosis of rheumatic diseases, was assessed using a collection of data in a cohort of 1,570 consecutive outpatients of a Dutch rheumatological clinic. Computer diagnoses based on these data and diagnostic predictions made by rheumatologists were compared with reference diagnoses that had been obtained by consensus of rheumatologists after 6-12 months follow-up. Performance of the tested version of the AI/RHEUM knowledge base is presented by various methods. Sensitivity varied between 29% and 100% for different rheumatological diseases. Average sensitivity and specificity for all 26 diagnoses present in the knowledge base were 67% and 98%, respectively. Performance according to the level of confidence indicated that 78% of the "definite", 65% of the "probable", and 33% of the "possible" conclusions made by AI/RHEUM were in agreement with the reference diagnoses. These results approximated the predictions made by rheumatologists after a single, initial examination. The system was less accurate than it had appeared in previous evaluation studies with complex clinical cases. The AI/RHEUM knowledge base needed refining to diagnose early rheumatic complaints. This study further illustrates the need for objective and informative parameters for expressing accuracy of diagnostic support systems.

摘要

相似文献

1
Validation of the AI/RHEUM knowledge base with data from consecutive rheumatological outpatients.
Methods Inf Med. 1992 Sep;31(3):175-81.
2
Computer-assisted diagnosis of pediatric rheumatic diseases.
Pediatrics. 1998 Oct;102(4):E48. doi: 10.1542/peds.102.4.e48.
3
AI/Consult: a prototype directed history system based upon the AI/Rheum knowledge base.AI/Consult:一个基于AI/Rheum知识库的原型定向病史系统。
Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1991:639-43.
4
AI/RHEUM. A consultant system for rheumatology.
J Med Syst. 1983 Jun;7(3):221-7. doi: 10.1007/BF00993283.
5
The AI/RHEUM knowledge-based computer consultant system in rheumatology. Performance in the diagnosis of 59 connective tissue disease patients from Japan.
Arthritis Rheum. 1988 Feb;31(2):219-26. doi: 10.1002/art.1780310210.
6
Comparison of rheumatological diagnoses by a Bayesian program and by physicians.
Methods Inf Med. 1991 Aug;30(3):187-93.
7
Diagnostic Accuracy of a Mobile AI-Based Symptom Checker and a Web-Based Self-Referral Tool in Rheumatology: Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.移动人工智能症状检查器和基于网络的自我转诊工具在风湿病学中的诊断准确性:多中心随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jul 23;26:e55542. doi: 10.2196/55542.
8
AI/LEARN network. The use of computer-generated graphics to augment the educational utility of a knowledge-based diagnostic system (AI/RHEUM).人工智能/学习网络。利用计算机生成的图形增强基于知识的诊断系统(人工智能/风湿病学)的教育效用。
J Med Syst. 1987 Oct;11(5):349-58. doi: 10.1007/BF00996349.
9
Development and validation of a computer program using Bayes's theorem to support diagnosis of rheumatic disorders.使用贝叶斯定理支持风湿性疾病诊断的计算机程序的开发与验证。
Ann Rheum Dis. 1992 Feb;51(2):266-71. doi: 10.1136/ard.51.2.266.
10
Stepwise development of a clinical expert system in rheumatology.
Clin Investig. 1993 Feb;71(2):139-44. doi: 10.1007/BF00179995.

引用本文的文献

1
Reliability of a generative artificial intelligence tool for pediatric familial Mediterranean fever: insights from a multicentre expert survey.生成式人工智能工具在儿科家族性地中海热中的可靠性:来自多中心专家调查的见解。
Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2024 Aug 23;22(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12969-024-01011-0.
2
Computer-based diagnostic expert systems in rheumatology: where do we stand in 2014?基于计算机的风湿病诊断专家系统:2014年我们处于什么水平?
Int J Rheumatol. 2014;2014:672714. doi: 10.1155/2014/672714. Epub 2014 Jul 8.
3
Evaluation of a cardiac diagnostic program in a typical clinical setting.
在典型临床环境中对心脏诊断程序的评估。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003 Jul-Aug;10(4):373-81. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1184. Epub 2003 Mar 28.
4
Reference standards, judges, and comparison subjects: roles for experts in evaluating system performance.参考标准、评判者与对照对象:专家在评估系统性能中的作用。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2002 Jan-Feb;9(1):1-15. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2002.0090001.
5
New approaches to measuring the performance of programs that generate differential diagnoses using ROC curves and other metrics.使用ROC曲线和其他指标来衡量生成鉴别诊断的程序性能的新方法。
Proc AMIA Symp. 2000:255-9.