Suppr超能文献

丙咪嗪治疗腰痛

Tofranil in the treatment of low back pain.

作者信息

Jenkins D G, Ebbutt A F, Evans C D

出版信息

J Int Med Res. 1976;4(2 Suppl):28-40.

PMID:140827
Abstract

This report describes a double-blind between-group comparison of Tofranil and placebo in fifty-nine patients admitted to the Joint Service Medical Rehabilitation Unit suffering from low back pain. Patients were given 25 mg of either Tofranil or placebo three times a day for four weeks. Fifteen patients were not included in the analysis, nine dropping out for non-trial related reasons, two dropping out complaining of lost libido and four not taking the tablets, or taking additional drugs. One of the patients complaining of lost libido was taking Tofranil and the other was taking placebo. Over the whole sample there was no significant benefit for Tofranil over placebo as regards physical measurements. Both Tofranil and placebo groups showed a significant improvement during the trial on straight leg raise and backward flexion. For lateral flexion the Tofranil group was significantly worse than the placebo group on entering the trial, and during the trial the Tofranil group improved to match the placebo group. The clinician's pain and stiffness assessments and the patients' pain and stiffness assessments show a significant improvement for both the Tofranil and placebo groups during the trial. However, no difference is shown between Tofranil and placebo. The psychological tests show no difference between Tofranil and placebo and only a marinal improvenmet over initial condition. Further analysis according to initial diagnosis showed nothing conclusive. Numerically, the use of Tofranil produced a marked improvement in pain and stiffness in patients with 'disc lesion only' diagnoses, whereas placebo did not produce an improvement. However, this observation was far from reaching statistical significance. Side-effects were not severe for either drug. Additional medication was rarely used.

摘要

本报告描述了在59名因腰痛入住联合服务医疗康复科的患者中进行的多虑平与安慰剂的双盲组间比较。患者每日三次服用25毫克多虑平或安慰剂,持续四周。15名患者未纳入分析,9名因与试验无关的原因退出,2名因抱怨性欲减退而退出,4名未服药或服用了额外药物。抱怨性欲减退的患者中,1名服用多虑平,另1名服用安慰剂。在整个样本中,就身体测量而言,多虑平相对于安慰剂没有显著益处。多虑平组和安慰剂组在试验期间直腿抬高和后伸方面均有显著改善。对于侧屈,多虑平组在试验开始时明显比安慰剂组差,在试验期间多虑平组有所改善,与安慰剂组相当。临床医生对疼痛和僵硬的评估以及患者对疼痛和僵硬的评估显示,多虑平组和安慰剂组在试验期间均有显著改善。然而,多虑平与安慰剂之间没有差异。心理测试显示多虑平与安慰剂之间没有差异,仅比初始状况有轻微改善。根据初始诊断进行的进一步分析没有得出确凿结论。从数字上看,使用多虑平使“仅椎间盘病变”诊断的患者的疼痛和僵硬有明显改善,而安慰剂没有产生改善。然而,这一观察结果远未达到统计学意义。两种药物的副作用都不严重。很少使用额外药物。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验