Collan Y, Klemi P, Kallioniemi O P, Joensuu H, Nordling S, Eskelinen M
Department of Pathology, University of Turku, Finland.
Pathol Res Pract. 1992 Jun;188(4-5):581-6. doi: 10.1016/s0344-0338(11)80060-9.
116 paraffin-embedded breast cancer samples were analyzed by flow cytometry. From each sample 3 consecutive 50 microns sections were cut for the study. The presence of neoplastic tissue was verified from light microscope sections cut before and after the adjacent sections. One laboratory started with one section from each block and was allowed extra sections when needed for analysis. At the end the laboratory obtained results from all 116 cases. The rest of the samples were studied by 2 other laboratories. Samples with results from 2 or 3 laboratories then allowed variability analysis and the estimation of the grading efficiency in a 2-grade system. Inconsistency in diploidy/aneuploidy distinction was present in 36 of 111 (32.4%) cases studied by two or three laboratories. This inconsistency was less obvious in samples graded as multiploid by at least one of the laboratories. The grading efficiency as analyzed from the results of 3 laboratories was 0.89, and of 2 laboratories, 0.84. The DNA index showed a slightly higher grading efficiency. At the cutoff point of 1.3, 91% of cases could be expected to be correctly classified into low ploidy and high ploidy groups (grading efficiency 0.91). The S-phase fraction had a mean grading efficiency of 0.89, a performance comparable to that of diploidy/aneuploidy distinction. In the light of the available data the flow cytometric analysis can add to the consistency of grading, especially when compared with subjective histological grading. However, the data do not suggest that flow cytometric analysis of paraffin sections as a grading method would be more consistent than quantitative histopathology from sections.
采用流式细胞术对116例石蜡包埋的乳腺癌样本进行分析。从每个样本中连续切取3个50微米厚的切片用于研究。通过相邻切片前后切取的光学显微镜切片来确认肿瘤组织的存在。一个实验室从每个样本块开始取一片,如有需要可额外获取切片用于分析。最后,该实验室获得了所有116例病例的结果。其余样本由另外两个实验室进行研究。来自两个或三个实验室的样本结果用于变异性分析和二级系统分级效率的评估。在由两个或三个实验室研究的111例病例中,有36例(32.4%)在二倍体/非整倍体区分上存在不一致。这种不一致在至少有一个实验室判定为多倍体的样本中不太明显。由三个实验室结果分析得出的分级效率为0.89,由两个实验室得出的为0.84。DNA指数显示出略高的分级效率。在截断点为1.3时,预计91%的病例能够正确分类为低倍体和高倍体组(分级效率0.91)。S期分数的平均分级效率为0.89,与二倍体/非整倍体区分的性能相当。根据现有数据,流式细胞术分析可提高分级的一致性,尤其是与主观的组织学分级相比时。然而,数据并未表明石蜡切片的流式细胞术分析作为一种分级方法会比切片的定量组织病理学更具一致性。