Suppr超能文献

石蜡包埋乳腺癌组织DNA流式细胞术检测结果的实验室间比对

Inter-laboratory comparison of DNA flow cytometric results from paraffin-embedded breast carcinomas.

作者信息

Kallioniemi O P, Joensuu H, Klemi P, Koivula T

机构信息

Department of Clinical Chemistry, Tampere University Central Hospital, Finland.

出版信息

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1990 Nov;17(1):59-61. doi: 10.1007/BF01812686.

Abstract

Consecutive sections from 33 paraffin-embedded human breast carcinomas without intratumor heterogeneity were sent for flow cytometric (FCM) DNA analysis in two experienced laboratories. FCM instruments, run conditions, and tumor disaggregation procedures were different in the two laboratories. In four cases (12%) the laboratories reported a different DNA ploidy and DNA index (DI). These variations were due to analytical reasons, differences in the detection rates of near-diploid and tetraploid DIs, not due to interpretation of data or the criteria used for aneuploidy. There was a significant correlation between S-phase fractions (SPF) obtained in the two laboratories (r = 0.90, p less than 0.0001) if only cases with concordant DI were included. Discordant DI usually led to very different SPF values.

摘要

从33例无肿瘤内异质性的石蜡包埋人乳腺癌中选取连续切片,送至两个经验丰富的实验室进行流式细胞术(FCM)DNA分析。两个实验室的FCM仪器、运行条件和肿瘤解离程序均不同。在4例(12%)病例中,两个实验室报告的DNA倍体和DNA指数(DI)不同。这些差异是由于分析原因、近二倍体和四倍体DI检测率的差异,而非数据解释或用于非整倍体的标准。如果仅纳入DI一致的病例,则两个实验室获得的S期分数(SPF)之间存在显著相关性(r = 0.90,p < 0.0001)。DI不一致通常导致非常不同的SPF值。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验