Marberger M, Hofbauer J, Türk C, Albrecht W
Department of Urology, University of Vienna, Austria.
Rev Med Suisse Romande. 1992 Sep;112(9):729-34.
As documented with results obtained in 1685 patients the treatment of ureteric stones is today based on ESWL in situ and ureteroscopy with semirigid, ultrathin ureteroscopes and laser lithotripsy. All stones in the upper third of the ureter and larger stones in the distal third of the ureter are preferably treated with ESWL in situ whereas smaller stones in the distal ureter are better treated endoscopically. Midureteric stones remain the domain of primary ureteroscopy; with moderate obstruction in the asymptomatic patient it may also be acceptable to wait for the stone to pass into the distal ureter spontaneously to be treated by ESWL in situ there. Manipulating stones back into the kidney and treating them by ESWL there (pushback/ESWL) offers no advantage over ESWL in situ, as the results are similar, yet morbidity is higher. Blind instrumentation and open surgery have lost all justification.
正如对1685例患者所获结果的记录,如今输尿管结石的治疗基于原位体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)以及使用半硬性超薄输尿管镜和激光碎石术的输尿管镜检查。输尿管上段的所有结石以及输尿管下段较大的结石最好采用原位ESWL治疗,而输尿管下段较小的结石则更适合采用内镜治疗。输尿管中段结石仍是原发性输尿管镜检查的范畴;对于无症状且有中度梗阻的患者,等待结石自行排入输尿管下段然后在原位进行ESWL治疗也可能是可以接受的。将结石推回肾脏并在那里进行ESWL治疗(推回/ESWL)与原位ESWL相比并无优势,因为结果相似,但发病率更高。盲目器械操作和开放手术已毫无合理性可言。