Kato Yuji, Yamaguchi Satoshi, Hori Jun-ichi, Okuyama Mitsuhiko, Kaneko Shigeo, Yachiku Sunao
The Department of Urology, Asahikawa Medical College.
Hinyokika Kiyo. 2005 May;51(5):309-14; dicussion 314.
We reviewed the records of the 530 patients with urinary stones (renal stones: 243; ureter stones 287) who received extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) (MFL5000; Dornier), from January 1995 to July 2002, retrospectively and determined whether the ureteral stent affected the incidence rate of stone street (SS). We also assessed the effect of ureteral stent on the subsequent management for SS. Forty patients (7.5%) developed SS. Twenty patients were inserted a ureteral stent prior to ESWL (stent group), and 20 patients were performed ESWL without a ureteral stent (in situ group). In the stent group, the most common (80.0%) location for SS was in the upper third ureter, while in the in situ group, SS mostly developed in the distal third ureter (60.0%). The incidence of SS did not differ significantly between the two groups when the size of renal and ureter stones was below 30 and 20 mm, respectively. When the renal stones were larger than above 30 mm, the incidence of SS in the stent group was significantly higher than that in the in situ group. SS disappeared spontaneously with stone passage in 10 of the patients in in situ group, but in only 1 patient in the stent group. In the stent group, 15 patients were treated for SS by removal of ureteral stent regardless of stone diameter. We conclude that ESWL should be performed without a ureteral stent when the stone diameter is below 20 mm. When the ureteral stent is thought to interfere with the delivery of stone fragments, the decision to remove it should be made as soon as possible.
我们回顾了1995年1月至2002年7月期间接受体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)(MFL5000;多尼尔)治疗的530例尿路结石患者(肾结石:243例;输尿管结石287例)的记录,进行回顾性分析,并确定输尿管支架是否影响石街(SS)的发生率。我们还评估了输尿管支架对SS后续治疗的影响。40例患者(7.5%)发生了SS。20例患者在ESWL前插入了输尿管支架(支架组),20例患者未放置输尿管支架进行ESWL(原位组)。在支架组中,SS最常见(80.0%)的位置是输尿管上段,而在原位组中,SS大多发生在输尿管下段(60.0%)。当肾结石和输尿管结石大小分别低于30mm和20mm时,两组SS的发生率无显著差异。当肾结石大于30mm时,支架组SS的发生率显著高于原位组。原位组10例患者的SS随结石排出而自行消失,但支架组仅1例。在支架组中,15例患者无论结石直径大小均通过取出输尿管支架治疗SS。我们得出结论,当结石直径小于20mm时,应在不放置输尿管支架的情况下进行ESWL。当认为输尿管支架会干扰结石碎片的排出时,应尽快决定取出。