Vajda J
National Institute of Neurosurgery, Budapest, Hungary.
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1992;118(1-2):59-75. doi: 10.1007/BF01400727.
There is still a relative silence in the literature on what policy should be followed in treating multiple aneurysms. The main risks are: bleeding of a formerly asymptomatic aneurysm during the haemodynamic tides of the peri-operative period; aneurysm(s) can be hidden on angiograms and tend to be overlooked easier in case of an already revealed aneurysm; misjudgement of the ruptured one as a silent additional aneurysm, therefore left for second stage surgery. This paper, based on a material of 330 operations for multiple aneurysms, focuses on these problems. It advocates the one stage complete repair of all lesions using both options of bilateral pterional craniotomies or the contralateral approach. But it also describes those silent aneurysms which safely could be clipped later. Hazards and disadvantages concerning the more aggressive surgery proved to be less significant than the natural history of multiple aneurysms represents.
关于治疗多发性动脉瘤应遵循何种策略,文献中仍相对缺乏相关论述。主要风险包括:在围手术期血流动力学波动期间,先前无症状的动脉瘤发生出血;动脉瘤可能在血管造影中未显示,且在已发现一个动脉瘤的情况下更容易被忽视;将破裂的动脉瘤误判为无症状的额外动脉瘤,从而留待二期手术处理。本文基于330例多发性动脉瘤手术的资料,聚焦于这些问题。它主张采用双侧翼点开颅术或对侧入路这两种方法,对所有病变进行一期完全修复。但它也描述了那些之后可以安全夹闭的无症状动脉瘤。事实证明,与多发性动脉瘤自然病程相比,更积极手术的风险和弊端并不那么显著。