Ounis I
CASSENNE Laboratories, Tour Roussel Hoechst, Puteaux, France.
Adv Exp Med Biol. 1992;319:165-74. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-3434-1_17.
Evaluation of the anti-infectious activity of an immunomodulator performed either in vitro or in vivo in animals as in humans must answer three questions: what are the targets? what models should be used to study the mechanism of action? what methodology should be selected for the assessment of therapeutic benefit? In the case of RU 41470 (Biostim), an immunomodulator with a known structure and of biological origin affects immunocompetent cells and two essential mediators: II1 and CSF. Because of multiple interactions between anti-infectious, anti-inflammatory and anti-allergic responses, as well as the pleiotropism of mediators, there exists no absolute predictive index of activity in vivo and, independently of models of immune deficiency, experimental infections are a particularly useful pharmacological model for study of the anti-infectious activity of any immunomodulator. In this model, RU 41470 tested by oral, intraperitoneal and aerosol administration, proved to be active regardless of the type of infectious agent for extracellular bacteria, intracellular bacteria, viruses or yeasts. Because of special local features of anti-infectious defences (pulmonary, cutaneous), the target organ must be identified when studying mechanism of action. RU 41740 stimulates the metabolic activities of alveolar macrophage and the target organ is the respiratory tract. From a clinical pharmacology standpoint, stimulation of different immune components has been investigated with RU 41470 at different dosages, using double-blind versus placebo designs. Target pathology, regardless of severity, includes a risk of infection and the existence of an immunological deficiency. Chronic bronchitis is a reference pathology since patients are subject to episodes of infection, resulting in acute decompensation and contributing to worsening of the ventilatory obstructive disorder. Clinical efficacy in terms of anti-infectious prophylaxis must be evaluated by a strict methodological approach: randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trials with prolonged follow-up. RU 41470 is effective in prophylaxis of respiratory infections in chronic bronchitis (reduction in the number of respiratory infections, their duration and in antibiotic consumption) and in prophylaxis of respiratory tract infections in children over one year old. Clinicians faced with the perplexity of the mechanism of action of immunomodulators and their number are preoccupied above all by the response which such an anti-infectious immunomodulator can offer in a context of clinical reality.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
对免疫调节剂抗感染活性的评估,无论是在体外进行,还是像在人体中那样在动物体内进行,都必须回答三个问题:靶点是什么?应该使用什么模型来研究作用机制?应该选择什么方法来评估治疗效果?就RU 41470(Biostim)而言,这种结构已知且来源于生物的免疫调节剂会影响免疫活性细胞以及两种重要的介质:白细胞介素1和集落刺激因子。由于抗感染、抗炎和抗过敏反应之间存在多种相互作用,以及介质的多效性,体内不存在绝对的活性预测指标,并且与免疫缺陷模型无关,实验性感染是研究任何免疫调节剂抗感染活性的一种特别有用的药理学模型。在这个模型中,通过口服、腹腔注射和气雾剂给药测试的RU 41470,无论感染因子是细胞外细菌、细胞内细菌、病毒还是酵母菌,都被证明具有活性。由于抗感染防御的特殊局部特征(肺部、皮肤),在研究作用机制时必须确定靶器官。RU 41740刺激肺泡巨噬细胞的代谢活性,靶器官是呼吸道。从临床药理学的角度来看,已经使用双盲与安慰剂对照设计,以不同剂量的RU 41470研究了对不同免疫成分的刺激作用。无论严重程度如何,目标病理包括感染风险和免疫缺陷的存在。慢性支气管炎是一种参考病理,因为患者易发生感染发作,导致急性失代偿,并促使通气性阻塞性疾病恶化。必须通过严格的方法来评估抗感染预防方面的临床疗效:进行长期随访的随机双盲安慰剂对照试验。RU 41470在预防慢性支气管炎的呼吸道感染方面(减少呼吸道感染的次数、持续时间以及抗生素的使用)以及在预防一岁以上儿童的呼吸道感染方面有效。面对免疫调节剂作用机制及其数量的困惑,临床医生首先关注的是这种抗感染免疫调节剂在临床实际情况下所能提供的反应。(摘要截选至400字)