• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

慢性胺碘酮治疗对除颤阈值的影响。

Effects of chronic amiodarone therapy on defibrillation threshold.

作者信息

Jung W, Manz M, Pizzulli L, Pfeiffer D, Lüderitz B

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, University of Bonn, Germany.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 1992 Oct 15;70(11):1023-7. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(92)90354-2.

DOI:10.1016/0002-9149(92)90354-2
PMID:1414899
Abstract

In a prospective and parallel, randomized study, the long-term stability of epicardial defibrillation threshold was evaluated in 22 patients, using a patch-patch lead configuration at the time of implantation and generator replacement. The concomitant antiarrhythmic drug treatment consisted of either mexiletine (720 mg/day) or amiodarone (400 mg/day) and was administered to patients in a randomized and parallel manner. During a mean follow-up of 24 +/- 6 months, the defibrillation threshold increased significantly from 14.3 +/- 2.8 to 17.9 +/- 5.3 J (p < 0.05) for the entire patient group. The increase in the chronic defibrillation threshold was due to a marked increase in defibrillation energy needs in the subgroup of patients receiving amiodarone. Whereas no significant change in the defibrillation threshold was documented in the subgroup of patients receiving mexiletine, the mean defibrillation threshold increased from 14.1 +/- 3.0 to 20.9 +/- 5.4 J (p < 0.001) in those receiving amiodarone. In all patients with increased defibrillation thresholds, reevaluation showed a reduction in the defibrillation threshold after discontinuation of antiarrhythmic drug therapy. The only variable associated with an increase in the chronic defibrillation threshold was amiodarone treatment. These findings suggest that the defibrillation threshold should be measured at each generator replacement and in case of a change in antiarrhythmic drug treatment. In particular, if amiodarone treatment is initiated, it is recommended that the defibrillation threshold should be reevaluated to ensure an adequate margin of safety.

摘要

在一项前瞻性、平行随机研究中,对22例患者的心外膜除颤阈值的长期稳定性进行了评估,在植入和更换发生器时采用贴片-贴片电极配置。同时使用的抗心律失常药物治疗方案为美西律(720mg/天)或胺碘酮(400mg/天),并以随机和平行的方式给予患者。在平均随访24±6个月期间,整个患者组的除颤阈值从14.3±2.8J显著增加到17.9±5.3J(p<0.05)。慢性除颤阈值的增加是由于接受胺碘酮治疗的患者亚组中除颤能量需求显著增加。接受美西律治疗的患者亚组中除颤阈值无显著变化,而接受胺碘酮治疗的患者亚组中平均除颤阈值从14.1±3.0J增加到20.9±5.4J(p<0.001)。在所有除颤阈值升高的患者中,重新评估显示在停用抗心律失常药物治疗后除颤阈值降低。与慢性除颤阈值增加相关的唯一变量是胺碘酮治疗。这些发现表明,在每次更换发生器时以及抗心律失常药物治疗发生变化时,都应测量除颤阈值。特别是,如果开始使用胺碘酮治疗,建议重新评估除颤阈值,以确保有足够的安全余量。

相似文献

1
Effects of chronic amiodarone therapy on defibrillation threshold.慢性胺碘酮治疗对除颤阈值的影响。
Am J Cardiol. 1992 Oct 15;70(11):1023-7. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(92)90354-2.
2
Effects of antiarrhythmic drugs on epicardial defibrillation energy requirements and the rate of defibrillator discharges.抗心律失常药物对心外膜除颤能量需求及除颤器放电率的影响。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1993 Jan;16(1 Pt 2):198-201. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1993.tb01561.x.
3
Success of chronic defibrillation and the role of antiarrhythmic drugs with the automatic implantable cardioverter/defibrillator.慢性除颤的成功以及抗心律失常药物在植入式自动心脏复律除颤器中的作用。
Am J Cardiol. 1987 Nov 1;60(13):1061-4. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(87)90352-3.
4
Effect of amiodarone and sotalol on the defibrillation threshold in comparison to patients without antiarrhythmic drug treatment.与未接受抗心律失常药物治疗的患者相比,胺碘酮和索他洛尔对除颤阈值的影响。
Int J Cardiol. 1999 Jun 1;69(3):271-9. doi: 10.1016/s0167-5273(99)00055-8.
5
Is there an effect of amiodarone on the defibrillation threshold?胺碘酮对除颤阈值有影响吗?
Jpn Heart J. 1993 Mar;34(2):221-6. doi: 10.1536/ihj.34.221.
6
The effect of chronic oral and acute intravenous amiodarone administration on ventricular defibrillation threshold using implanted electrodes in dogs.长期口服和急性静脉注射胺碘酮对使用植入电极的犬心室除颤阈值的影响。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1989 Feb;12(2):339-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1989.tb02667.x.
7
Effect of amiodarone and sotalol on ventricular defibrillation threshold: the optimal pharmacological therapy in cardioverter defibrillator patients (OPTIC) trial.胺碘酮与索他洛尔对心室除颤阈值的影响:心脏转复除颤器患者的最佳药物治疗(OPTIC)试验
Circulation. 2006 Jul 11;114(2):104-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.618421. Epub 2006 Jul 3.
8
Predictors of defibrillation energy requirements with nonepicardial lead systems.非心外膜导线系统除颤能量需求的预测因素。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1995 Feb;18(2):253-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1995.tb02515.x.
9
Effects of oral propafenone on defibrillation and pacing thresholds in patients receiving implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. Propafenone Defibrillation Threshold Investigators.口服普罗帕酮对植入式心脏复律除颤器患者除颤和起搏阈值的影响。普罗帕酮除颤阈值研究组。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996 Aug;28(2):418-22. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(96)00156-8.
10
Ventricular pacing threshold and time to capture postdefibrillation in patients undergoing implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation.接受植入式心脏复律除颤器植入术患者的心室起搏阈值及除颤后夺获时间
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1991 May;14(5 Pt 1):768-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1991.tb04104.x.

引用本文的文献

1
A Comprehensive Review of a Mechanism-Based Ventricular Electrical Storm Management.基于机制的心室电风暴管理综合综述
J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 29;14(15):5351. doi: 10.3390/jcm14155351.
2
Emergency Management of Electrical Storm: A Practical Overview.电风暴的应急处理:实用概述。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Feb 19;59(2):405. doi: 10.3390/medicina59020405.
3
Effectiveness and safety of mexiletine in patients at risk for (recurrent) ventricular arrhythmias: a systematic review.美西律治疗(复发性)室性心律失常高危患者的有效性和安全性:系统评价。
Europace. 2022 Nov 22;24(11):1809-1823. doi: 10.1093/europace/euac087.
4
Electrical Storm in Patients with Implantable Cardioverter-defibrillators: A Practical Overview.植入式心脏复律除颤器患者的电风暴:实用概述。
J Innov Card Rhythm Manag. 2017 Oct 15;8(10):2853-2861. doi: 10.19102/icrm.2017.081002. eCollection 2017 Oct.
5
Electrical Storm: Current Evidence, Clinical Implications, and Future Perspectives.电风暴:当前证据、临床意义和未来展望。
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2019 Jul 27;21(9):96. doi: 10.1007/s11886-019-1190-0.
6
Defibrillation Threshold Testing: Current Status.除颤阈值测试:现状
Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2018 Dec;7(4):288-293. doi: 10.15420/aer.2018.54.2.
7
Long-term performance of right ventricular pacing leads: risk factors associated with permanent right ventricular pacing threshold increase.
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2019 Sep;55(3):349-357. doi: 10.1007/s10840-018-0481-5. Epub 2018 Nov 6.
8
Management of ventricular tachycardia storm in patients with structural heart disease.结构性心脏病患者室性心动过速风暴的管理
World J Cardiol. 2017 Jun 26;9(6):521-530. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v9.i6.521.
9
[Clinical aspects of treatment with amiodarone].[胺碘酮治疗的临床方面]
Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 2017 Sep;28(3):307-316. doi: 10.1007/s00399-017-0516-0.
10
Amiodarone versus other pharmacological interventions for prevention of sudden cardiac death.胺碘酮与其他预防心源性猝死的药物干预措施的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Dec 8;2015(12):CD008093. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008093.pub2.