Nelson J D, Gordon J F
Department of Ophthalmology, Ramsey Clinic, St. Paul-Ramsey Medical Center, Minnesota 55101.
Am J Ophthalmol. 1992 Oct 15;114(4):441-7. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)71856-2.
Topical fibronectin was evaluated for the treatment of keratoconjunctivitis sicca in a multicenter, double-masked, controlled study in which 272 patients were randomly assigned to treatment. Patients with documented clinical evidence of keratoconjunctivitis sicca received either fibronectin, a vehicle alone, or a commercially available artificial tear. Evaluation at baseline, 21, 42, and 63 days consisted of patient self-evaluation of symptoms, rose bengal and fluorescein staining, tear breakup time, Schirmer's testing, and conjunctival impression cytology. Although all groups showed improvements in most study variables during the course of the study, there were no statistically significant differences found between any of the groups. Topical fibronectin does not appear to be more effective than artificial tears in the treatment of keratoconjunctivitis sicca.
在一项多中心、双盲、对照研究中,对局部应用纤连蛋白治疗干眼症进行了评估,该研究中272例患者被随机分配接受治疗。有干眼症临床证据记录的患者分别接受纤连蛋白、单独的赋形剂或市售人工泪液治疗。在基线、21天、42天和63天时的评估包括患者对症状的自我评估、孟加拉红和荧光素染色、泪膜破裂时间、泪液分泌试验和结膜印迹细胞学检查。尽管在研究过程中所有组在大多数研究变量上均有改善,但各治疗组之间未发现有统计学意义的差异。在治疗干眼症方面,局部应用纤连蛋白似乎并不比人工泪液更有效。