Rajiv Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences and RIMS Government Hospital, Srikakulam, 532001, India.
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 120012, India.
BMC Ophthalmol. 2023 Mar 27;23(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s12886-023-02838-z.
Keratoconjunctivitis sicca or dry eye disease (DED) is a multifactorial disorder underpinned by a complex inflammatory cycle. Introduction of topical cyclosporine has been a significant advance in the management of DED. In recent years advancements in formulation technology have led to development of micellar nano-particulate (MNP) cyclosporine formulations that promise better penetration into ocular target tissues and potential for reduced ocular surface irritation.
We compared two dosing regimes of a proprietary MNP cyclosporine emulsion with the widely marketed topical cyclosporine formulation Restasis™ in a multicenter parallel-group randomised trial in patients with DED. Patients were randomised to one of 3 treatment groups with 90 patients eligible for the per protocol analysis: 30 in the higher dose test arm A; 32 in the lower dose test arm B; and 28 in the Restasis™ control arm C. All scored efficacy endpoints were tested for significance by comparing the mean change in scores from baseline in the test groups with that in the control group at 12 weeks, using the Student's t test. Wilcoxon's rank sum test was used to test individual symptom scores and clinician's global evaluation of treatment grades.
Corneal fluorescein staining score, the primary efficacy endpoint, decreased by 6.8 ± 4.0, 5.7 ± 3.9, and 4.6 ± 3.6 points in the 3 groups respectively, indicating superior efficacy in test arm A in comparison to control arm C (p = 0.0026). Schirmer's tear test, conjunctival lissamine staining score, ocular surface disease index, and individual dry eye symptom scores also favoured higher dose MNP cyclosporine over Restasis™. The study failed to differentiate the treatment arms in terms of clinician's global evaluation of treatment, use of tear substitutes, best corrected visual acuity or safety and toleration.
The results indicate that the dose of 1 drop of a 0.05% w/v ophthalmic emulsion of MNP cyclosporine administered topically twice daily yields better outcomes at 12 weeks than the lower dose tested in the study, and is more efficacious than an equivalent dose of Restasis™, the active control used in the study.
This trial was registered in the Clinical Trials Registry of India on 29/03/2019, and was assigned registration number CTRI/2019/03/018319.
干眼症(DED)又称干燥性角结膜炎,是一种多因素疾病,其发病基础是复杂的炎症循环。局部环孢素的应用是 DED 治疗的重大进展。近年来,制剂技术的进步促使开发了胶束纳米颗粒(MNP)环孢素制剂,有望更好地渗透到眼部靶组织,并减少眼部表面刺激。
我们在一项多中心平行组随机临床试验中,比较了一种专有 MNP 环孢素乳剂与广泛销售的局部环孢素制剂 Restasis™ 在 DED 患者中的两种给药方案。患者被随机分配到 3 个治疗组之一,90 名患者符合方案分析的条件:高剂量试验臂 A 组 30 名;低剂量试验臂 B 组 32 名;Restasis™对照组 C 组 28 名。所有评分疗效终点均通过比较 12 周时试验组与对照组的基线评分变化,使用学生 t 检验进行显著性检验。Wilcoxon 秩和检验用于检验个体症状评分和临床医生对治疗等级的总体评估。
角膜荧光素染色评分是主要疗效终点,3 组分别下降 6.8±4.0、5.7±3.9 和 4.6±3.6 分,表明试验臂 A 优于对照组 C(p=0.0026)。泪液分泌试验、结膜丽丝胺染色评分、眼表疾病指数和个体干眼症状评分也表明高剂量 MNP 环孢素优于 Restasis™。研究未能在临床医生对治疗的总体评估、泪替代物的使用、最佳矫正视力或安全性和耐受性方面区分治疗臂。
结果表明,每天两次局部使用 0.05% w/v MNP 环孢素滴眼液 1 滴的剂量在 12 周时比研究中测试的低剂量产生更好的结果,并且比研究中使用的等效剂量 Restasis™更有效。
该试验于 2019 年 3 月 29 日在印度临床试验注册处注册,并被分配注册号 CTRI/2019/03/018319。