Lim M, Cross G D, Sold M
St. Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.
Anaesthesist. 1992 Sep;41(9):539-43.
A randomised study was performed to compare the frequency of postdural puncture headache in 56 patients who underwent spinal anaesthesia for extra-corporeal shockwave lithotripsy using either a Sprotte 24 G (n = 28) or Vygon 29 G or Quincke type needle (n = 28). Frequency of headache was recorded in a similar group of 28 patients who received general anaesthesia.
Dural puncture was easier with the Sprotte 24 G cannula than with the less stable Quincke needle, as documented by a significantly shortened time for insertion of the cannula (4.6 +/- 2.6 vs 8.6 +/- 6.3 min, P less than 0.005). The total frequency of post-operative headache was 57% in the Vygon 29 G group and 25% in the Sprotte 24 G group; 21% of patients in the general anaesthesia group complained of headache. Frequency of postdural puncture headache, classified as being posture-related, was 25% in the 29 G Vygon group, compared with 11% in the 24 G Sprotte group (P = 0.148). When only moderate and severe postdural puncture headache was considered, there was a significant difference (25% vs. 4%; P = 0.026) in favour of the Sprotte cannula.
Thus, the 24 G Sprotte needle was at least as effective as the 29 G Vygon needle, and there is a suggestion that the former is more effective in minimising the incidence of moderate or severe postdural puncture headache.
进行了一项随机研究,比较56例接受体外冲击波碎石术脊髓麻醉的患者,使用Sprotte 24G(n = 28)或Vygon 29G或Quincke型针(n = 28)后硬膜穿刺后头痛的发生率。在一组接受全身麻醉的28例类似患者中记录头痛发生率。
Sprotte 24G套管穿刺硬膜比稳定性较差的Quincke针更容易,套管插入时间显著缩短证明了这一点(4.6±2.6对8.6±6.3分钟,P<0.005)。Vygon 29G组术后头痛总发生率为57%,Sprotte 24G组为25%;全身麻醉组21%的患者主诉头痛。与姿势相关的硬膜穿刺后头痛发生率,Vygon 29G组为25%,Sprotte 24G组为11%(P = 0.148)。仅考虑中度和重度硬膜穿刺后头痛时,Sprotte套管有显著差异(25%对4%;P = 0.026)。
因此,24G Sprotte针至少与29G Vygon针一样有效,并且有迹象表明前者在将中度或重度硬膜穿刺后头痛的发生率降至最低方面更有效。