• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[Does a cone-shaped cannula needle offer an advantage in spinal anesthesia?].

作者信息

Büttner J, Wresch K P, Klose R

机构信息

Abteilung für Anaesthesie und Intensivmedizin der Berufsgenossenschaftlichen Unfallklinik Ludwigshafen.

出版信息

Reg Anaesth. 1990 Jul;13(5):124-8.

PMID:2202024
Abstract

The so-called atraumatic spinal cannula of Sprotte is a modification of the Whitacre spinal needle. It consists of a conical tip with a lateral opening. This cannula (24 G) is said to cause a very low incidence of postspinal headache. In a prospective study, it was compared to a 25 G cannula with a Quincke tip. PATIENTS AND METHOD. The study was carried out on 500 patients who received spinal anesthesia for operations on the lower extremities. The cannulas were randomly assigned to the patients. Puncture characteristics and number of incomplete blocks were evaluated. Postoperatively patients were interviewed on days 1, 3, 5, and 7. Neither the subjects nor the investigator were aware of the type of cannula used. RESULTS. There were no differences with regard to age and sex; 80% of the patients ranged between 15 and 55 years, with a homogeneous spread. Performance of the block was superior with the Sprotte cannula and the incidence of incomplete blocks was lower (1.6% vs 7.8%, P = 0.0011). There was no significant difference with regard to postspinal headache (8.2% vs 7.8%). CONCLUSIONS. The atraumatic cannula had better puncture characteristics, but there was no statistically significant difference with regard to postspinal headaches.

摘要

相似文献

1
[Does a cone-shaped cannula needle offer an advantage in spinal anesthesia?].
Reg Anaesth. 1990 Jul;13(5):124-8.
2
Postdural puncture headache: comparison of 25-gauge Whitacre and Quincke needles.硬膜穿刺后头痛:25G Whitacre针与Quincke针的比较
Reg Anesth. 1993 May-Jun;18(3):166-9.
3
[Postspinal headache. A comparison of the 24G Sprotte syringe and a 29G Quincke needle].[脊柱穿刺后头痛。24G Sprotte注射器与29G Quincke针的比较]
Anaesthesist. 1992 Sep;41(9):539-43.
4
[The relief of postspinal headache using the Whitacre cannula. A clinical study].[使用Whitacre套管缓解脊柱穿刺后头痛。一项临床研究]
Reg Anaesth. 1989 May;12(3):46-9.
5
[Post spinal headache. Its incidence following the median and paramedian techniques].[脊柱穿刺后头痛。采用正中及旁正中技术后的发生率]
Anaesthesist. 1992 Mar;41(3):137-41.
6
[The effect of needle type and immobilization on postspinal headache].[针型与制动对脊柱穿刺后头痛的影响]
Anaesthesist. 1997 Oct;46(10):860-6. doi: 10.1007/s001010050480.
7
[Comparison of two 27-G-caliber needles for spinal anesthesia. Study of 1,555 patients].[两种27G口径腰麻针的比较。对1555例患者的研究]
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2003 Apr;50(4):182-7.
8
Postdural puncture headache and back pain after spinal anesthesia with 27-gauge Quincke and 26-gauge Atraucan needles.使用27号Quincke针和26号Atraucan针进行脊髓麻醉后发生的硬膜穿刺后头痛和背痛。
Reg Anesth. 1996 Sep-Oct;21(5):461-4.
9
[The sprotte needle decreases the incidence of postspinal headache].斯普罗特针降低了脊髓穿刺后头痛的发生率。
Masui. 1993 Jul;42(7):1086-90.
10
Post dural puncture headache after spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section: a comparison of 25 g Quincke, 27 g Quincke and 27 g Whitacre spinal needles.剖宫产脊髓麻醉后硬膜穿刺头痛:25G Quincke针、27G Quincke针和27G Whitacre脊髓针的比较
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2008 Jul-Sep;20(3):10-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Needle gauge and tip designs for preventing post-dural puncture headache (PDPH).预防硬膜穿刺后头痛(PDPH)的针规和针尖设计。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 7;4(4):CD010807. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010807.pub2.
2
Postdural puncture headache: a randomized prospective comparison of the 24 gauge Sprotte and the 27 gauge Quincke needles in young patients.硬膜穿刺后头痛:24号Sprotte针与27号Quincke针在年轻患者中的随机前瞻性比较
Can J Anaesth. 1993 Jul;40(7):607-11. doi: 10.1007/BF03009696.