LOGAN J E, HAIGHT D E
Can Med Assoc J. 1964 Sep 12;91(11):581-5.
The commercial test papers, Tes-Tape, Clinistix, Uristix and Combistix, and the tablet preparation, Clinitest, were evaluated as indicators of glucose in urine by means of a quantitative automated glucose oxidase procedure for glucose determination. The semiquantitative Tes-Tape yielded very low values on urine specimens when compared with the quantitative method. More reliable results could be obtained with this product if the urine specimens were first treated with a mixed bed resin to remove inhibitors of the glucose oxidase peroxidase system. The qualitative test papers, Clinistix, Uristix and Combistix, yielded responses in closer agreement with the automated data, the best performance being obtained with Clinistix. The semiquantitative Clinitest tablets generally yielded more accurate results on a direct urine test than did Tes-Tape, although the Clinitest tablet is designed to measure total reducing substances rather than glucose alone.
通过定量自动葡萄糖氧化酶法测定葡萄糖,对市售试纸Tes-Tape、Clinistix、Uristix和Combistix以及片剂制剂Clinitest进行了评估,以作为尿糖指标。与定量方法相比,半定量的Tes-Tape在尿液标本上得出的值非常低。如果首先用混合床树脂处理尿液标本以去除葡萄糖氧化酶过氧化物酶系统的抑制剂,则使用该产品可获得更可靠的结果。定性试纸Clinistix、Uristix和Combistix得出的结果与自动检测数据更一致,其中Clinistix的表现最佳。半定量的Clinitest片剂在直接尿液检测中通常比Tes-Tape产生更准确的结果,尽管Clinitest片剂旨在测量总还原物质而非仅葡萄糖。