Hii J T, Wyse D G, Gillis A M, Duff H J, Solylo M A, Mitchell L B
Department of Medicine, Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Circulation. 1992 Nov;86(5):1376-82. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.86.5.1376.
Patients with a history of class Ia drug-induced torsade de pointes have been treated with chronic amiodarone without recurrence of torsade de pointes despite comparable prolongation of the QT interval. We hypothesized that in such patients, class Ia drugs cause nonhomogeneous prolongation of cardiac repolarization times, whereas amiodarone causes homogeneous prolongation of cardiac repolarization times.
Thirty-eight consecutive patients who received both class Ia drug therapy and chronic amiodarone therapy were evaluated. Standard 12-lead ECGs at baseline and during each therapy were used to calculate precordial QT interval dispersion (maximum QT in leads V1 through V6 minus minimum QT leads V1 through V6) as a measure of regional variabilities in ventricular repolarization times. Nine of these patients had torsade de pointes during class Ia drug therapy. In these nine patients, class Ia drug therapy and amiodarone significantly prolonged the maximum QT interval to comparable extents. However, class Ia drug therapy but not amiodarone therapy significantly increased precordial QT interval dispersion (101 +/- 37 versus 49 +/- 26 msec; baseline, 44 +/- 12 msec; p = 0.002). In the 29 patients without class Ia drug-induced torsade de pointes, neither class Ia drug therapy nor amiodarone therapy significantly increased QT interval dispersion (50 +/- 6 versus 69 +/- 7 msec; baseline, 54 +/- 5 msec). None of the patients with class Ia drug-induced torsade de pointes had recurrent torsade de pointes during chronic amiodarone therapy.
An increase in regional QT interval dispersion during class Ia antiarrhythmic drug therapy is associated with torsade de pointes. Chronic amiodarone therapy in patients with a history of class Ia drug-induced torsade de pointes produces comparable maximum QT interval prolongation but does not increase QT interval dispersion. This characteristic may explain its apparent safe use in patients with a history of class Ia drug-induced torsade de pointes.
有Ia类药物诱发尖端扭转型室速病史的患者接受慢性胺碘酮治疗后,尽管QT间期有类似程度的延长,但未再发生尖端扭转型室速。我们推测,在此类患者中,Ia类药物导致心脏复极时间的非均匀延长,而胺碘酮导致心脏复极时间的均匀延长。
对38例先后接受Ia类药物治疗和慢性胺碘酮治疗的连续患者进行评估。使用基线及每种治疗期间的标准12导联心电图计算胸前导联QT间期离散度(V1至V6导联的最大QT减去V1至V6导联的最小QT),作为心室复极时间区域变异性的指标。其中9例患者在Ia类药物治疗期间发生尖端扭转型室速。在这9例患者中,Ia类药物治疗和胺碘酮均使最大QT间期显著延长至类似程度。然而,Ia类药物治疗而非胺碘酮治疗显著增加了胸前导联QT间期离散度(分别为101±37与49±26毫秒;基线为44±12毫秒;p = 0.002)。在29例无Ia类药物诱发尖端扭转型室速的患者中,Ia类药物治疗和胺碘酮治疗均未显著增加QT间期离散度(分别为50±6与69±7毫秒;基线为54±5毫秒)。在有Ia类药物诱发尖端扭转型室速病史的患者中,无一例在慢性胺碘酮治疗期间复发尖端扭转型室速。
Ia类抗心律失常药物治疗期间区域QT间期离散度增加与尖端扭转型室速相关。有Ia类药物诱发尖端扭转型室速病史的患者接受慢性胺碘酮治疗可产生类似程度的最大QT间期延长,但不会增加QT间期离散度。这一特性可能解释了其在有Ia类药物诱发尖端扭转型室速病史患者中明显安全应用的原因。