Nutt M P, Fields B L, Sebree L A, Southard J H, Pyzalska D, Pyzalski R, Thomas A, Mentzer R M, Bianco J A
Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison.
Circulation. 1992 Nov;86(5 Suppl):II333-8.
University of Wisconsin solution has shown promise for prolonged cardiac preservation. This study compared the effects of 24-hour cold storage and perfusion preservation techniques by assessment of function, perfusion, metabolism, and histological changes.
Three groups of rabbit hearts (n = 6 each) were evaluated: 1) control with immediate reperfusion, 2) continuous perfusion preservation, and 3) cold storage. Hearts were reperfused for 30 minutes, and left ventricular systolic pressure (LVSP) was measured by isovolumetric balloon (LVEDP, 20 mm Hg). We used 201Tl to assess perfusion and 14C-acetate to assess metabolism by macroautoradiography. LVSP was similar for controls and hearts preserved with continuous perfusion (134.8 +/- 2.1 versus 112.2 +/- 6.0 mm Hg, respectively). Hearts preserved with cold storage techniques were significantly worse (36.7 +/- 6.0 versus 134.4 +/- 8.2 mm Hg, p < 0.001). Controls showed homogeneous perfusion and metabolism, whereas hearts in the continuous perfusion group showed mild hypoperfusion and histological damage (26.4 +/- 2.7% of left ventricular cross section). Hearts in the cold storage group had 51.7 +/- 1.2% of the left ventricle hypoperfused and damaged. Histology in the control group was normal; in the perfused group, there were only mild changes; and in the cold storage group, there were extensive derangements of cellular architecture.
Continuous perfusion of the heart with 4 degrees C modified University of Wisconsin solution provided function comparable to that of control. Conversely, cold storage showed extremely poor return of function. Autoradiography confirmed mild perfusion and metabolism abnormalities in control and continuous perfusion hearts, whereas there was marked derangement of cellular architecture, perfusion, and metabolism in the cold storage hearts.
威斯康星大学溶液已显示出在延长心脏保存方面的前景。本研究通过评估功能、灌注、代谢和组织学变化,比较了24小时冷藏和灌注保存技术的效果。
对三组兔心脏(每组n = 6)进行评估:1)立即再灌注的对照组,2)持续灌注保存组,3)冷藏组。心脏再灌注30分钟,通过等容球囊测量左心室收缩压(LVSP)(左心室舒张末压,20 mmHg)。我们使用201Tl评估灌注,使用14C-醋酸盐通过宏观放射自显影评估代谢。对照组和持续灌注保存的心脏的LVSP相似(分别为134.8±2.1与112.2±6.0 mmHg)。采用冷藏技术保存的心脏明显较差(36.7±6.0与134.4±8.2 mmHg,p < 0.001)。对照组显示灌注和代谢均匀,而持续灌注组的心脏显示轻度灌注不足和组织学损伤(左心室横截面的26.4±2.7%)。冷藏组的心脏有51.7±1.2%的左心室灌注不足和受损。对照组组织学正常;灌注组仅有轻度变化;冷藏组有广泛的细胞结构紊乱。
用4℃改良威斯康星大学溶液持续灌注心脏可提供与对照组相当的功能。相反,冷藏显示功能恢复极差。放射自显影证实对照组和持续灌注心脏有轻度灌注和代谢异常,而冷藏心脏有明显的细胞结构、灌注和代谢紊乱。