Hughes E G, Fedorkow D M, Daya S, Sagle M A, Van de Koppel P, Collins J A
McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Fertil Steril. 1992 Nov;58(5):888-96. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)55430-2.
To assess the efficacy of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRH-a) used in ovulation induction for in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) and gamete intrafallopian transfer (GIFT).
Meta-analysis of 10 trials comparing treatment cycle outcomes after GnRH-a (n = 914) with other ovulation induction protocols (n = 722) and 7 trials comparing outcomes after short flare-up (n = 368) with longer suppression (n = 476) GnRH-a protocols.
The outcome of primary interest was clinical pregnancy rate (PR) per treatment cycle commenced. Data describing the amount of gonadotropin used, cycle cancellation rate, clinical pregnancy per ET, and multiple pregnancy and abortion rates were also analyzed.
Clinical PR per cycle commenced was significantly improved after GnRH-a use for IVF (common odds ratio [OR] 1.80, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.33 to 2.44) and GIFT (common OR 2.37, 95% CI 1.24 to 4.51). Clinical PR per embryo transfer was also significantly improved with GnRH-a use (common OR 1.40, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.95). Cycle cancellation was decreased (common OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.44), whereas spontaneous abortion rate was similar with and without GnRH-a use. Cycle cancellation and PRs after short flare-up and longer suppression protocols were similar between groups.
This meta-analysis supports the routine use of GnRH-a for IVF and GIFT. Further research is needed, however, to assess the potential for increased rates of multiple pregnancy and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, which may be associated with this treatment.
评估促性腺激素释放激素激动剂(GnRH-a)用于体外受精-胚胎移植(IVF-ET)及配子输卵管内移植(GIFT)诱导排卵的疗效。
对10项将GnRH-a治疗周期结局(n = 914)与其他排卵诱导方案(n = 722)进行比较的试验,以及7项将短期激发方案(n = 368)与长期抑制方案(n = 476)的GnRH-a方案结局进行比较的试验进行荟萃分析。
主要关注的结局是每个开始治疗周期的临床妊娠率(PR)。还分析了描述促性腺激素使用量、周期取消率、每次胚胎移植的临床妊娠率以及多胎妊娠和流产率的数据。
GnRH-a用于IVF(合并优势比[OR] 1.80,95%置信区间[CI] 1.33至2.44)和GIFT(合并OR 2.37,95% CI 1.24至4.51)后,每个开始周期的临床PR显著提高。使用GnRH-a后,每次胚胎移植的临床PR也显著提高(合并OR 1.40,95% CI 1.01至1.95)。周期取消率降低(合并OR 0.33,95% CI 0.25至0.44),而使用和未使用GnRH-a时自然流产率相似。短期激发方案和长期抑制方案后的周期取消率和PR在组间相似。
这项荟萃分析支持将GnRH-a常规用于IVF和GIFT。然而,需要进一步研究以评估多胎妊娠率和卵巢过度刺激综合征增加的可能性,这可能与该治疗相关。