Health Devices. 1992 Sep;21(9):323-8.
A nurse's aide, in transferring a mother in labor to the delivery room, turned off the infusion pump delivering Pitocin, a drug administered intravenously to accelerate contractions. The aide removed the infusion set from the pump without first closing the manual clamp on the line. A free-flow infusion occurred, and the mother received nearly 35 times the prescribed amount of drug. The infant suffered organ damage and pneumonia and died four days later. Free-flow infusions can have tragic consequences when a potent drug is involved. Although other causes of overinfusion and free-flow exist, such incidents are typically associated with removing a disposable intravenous (IV) infusion set from an infusion device without first closing the manual clamp. We first raised this issue in our 1982 Evaluation "Infusion Controllers" and have emphatically and repeatedly addressed it in Health Devices and other ECRI publications. Yet, hospitals continue to report free-flow infusions, a problem that can be addressed by both hospitals and device manufacturers. In this article, we describe the causes of free-flow--both user error and device design; report numerous incidents, some resulting in death; and provide recommendations for reducing the likelihood that such problems will continue to occur.
一名护士助理在将一名临产孕妇转移到产房时,关掉了正在静脉输注催产素(一种用于加速宫缩的药物)的输液泵。该助理在未先关闭输液管上的手动夹的情况下,就从泵上取下了输液装置。于是出现了自由流动输液的情况,这位母亲接受的药物剂量几乎是规定剂量的35倍。婴儿遭受了器官损伤和肺炎,四天后死亡。当涉及强效药物时,自由流动输液可能会产生悲惨后果。尽管存在其他输液过量和自由流动的原因,但此类事件通常与在未先关闭手动夹的情况下从输液装置上取下一次性静脉输液装置有关。我们在1982年的评估报告《输液控制器》中首次提出了这个问题,并在《医疗设备》及其他医疗安全与风险研究院(ECRI)的出版物中着重且反复地提及了这一问题。然而,医院仍不断报告自由流动输液事件,这个问题医院和设备制造商都可以解决。在本文中,我们描述了自由流动输液的原因——包括用户错误和设备设计问题;报告了多起事件,其中一些导致了死亡;并提出了一些建议,以降低此类问题继续发生的可能性。