Suppr超能文献

重症监护中消化道选择性去污的对照试验及其对医院感染的影响。

A controlled trial of selective decontamination of the digestive tract in intensive care and its effect on nosocomial infection.

作者信息

Winter R, Humphreys H, Pick A, MacGowan A P, Willatts S M, Speller D C

机构信息

Intensive Therapy Unit, Bristol Royal Infirmary, UK.

出版信息

J Antimicrob Chemother. 1992 Jul;30(1):73-87. doi: 10.1093/jac/30.1.73.

Abstract

Nosocomial infection is a major problem in intensive therapy units (ITUs) and a significant cause of mortality. Selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD) has been advocated as a means to reduce ITU morbidity and mortality. Ninety-one patients in a general ITU underwent SDD, consisting of topical polymyxin E, tobramycin and amphotericin B administered throughout the unit stay together with parenteral ceftazidime for the first three days, and were compared with 84 historical and 92 contemporaneous control patients who were treated conventionally. Twenty-seven historical and 32 contemporaneous control patients developed unit-acquired infections, in comparison with only three patients in the SDD group (P less than 0.01). Mortality in the SDD group (36%) was not significantly different from that in the other two groups (historical control 40%, contemporaneous control 43%). Screening specimens revealed a significantly higher rate of colonization with resistant Acinetobacter spp. in the contemporaneous control than in the other two groups of patients; infection caused by resistant bacteria did not occur. SDD did not lead to a significant reduction in the use of systemically-administered antibiotics when compared with either control group. SDD may be used selectively in an ITU without ill effects on those patients not receiving SDD; nevertheless, microbiological monitoring is needed to detect emergence of resistant bacteria in the unit.

摘要

医院感染是重症监护病房(ITU)的一个主要问题,也是导致死亡的一个重要原因。消化道选择性去污(SDD)已被提倡作为一种降低ITU发病率和死亡率的方法。一个普通ITU中的91名患者接受了SDD,包括在整个住院期间局部使用多粘菌素E、妥布霉素和两性霉素B,同时在前三天静脉注射头孢他啶,并与84名历史对照患者和92名同期对照患者进行比较,后两组患者接受常规治疗。27名历史对照患者和32名同期对照患者发生了院内感染,而SDD组只有3名患者发生感染(P<0.01)。SDD组的死亡率(36%)与其他两组(历史对照40%,同期对照43%)没有显著差异。筛查标本显示,同期对照患者中耐不动杆菌属的定植率明显高于其他两组患者;未发生由耐药菌引起的感染。与任何一个对照组相比,SDD并没有导致全身使用抗生素的显著减少。SDD可在ITU中选择性使用,对未接受SDD的患者没有不良影响;然而,需要进行微生物监测以检测该病房中耐药菌的出现。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验