Kirsch I, Mobayed C P, Council J R, Kenny D A
Department of Psychology, University of Connecticut, Storrs 06269-1020.
J Abnorm Psychol. 1992 Nov;101(4):657-62. doi: 10.1037//0021-843x.101.4.657.
Suggestibility was assessed in 60 college students after a traditional hypnotic induction, an alert induction, progressive relaxation training, or instruction in goal-directed imagery. Responsiveness to suggestion did not differ between groups. Subjects also generated open-ended reports of their states of awareness and of their experience of 3 hypnotic suggestions. A sample of these reports from 24 moderately to highly suggestible subjects were evaluated by 18 experts in the field of hypnosis. Expert ratings of subjects' open-ended reports indicated that (a) traditional hypnotic inductions produce a state of consciousness that is indistinguishable from nonhypnotic relaxation training, (b) the subjective experience of hypnotic suggestions after imagination training is indistinguishable from that after hypnotic inductions, and (c) suggestibility is unrelated to state of consciousness as assessed by experts.
在60名大学生接受传统催眠诱导、警觉诱导、渐进性放松训练或目标导向意象指导后，对其受暗示性进行了评估。各组之间对暗示的反应没有差异。受试者还就其意识状态和对3条催眠暗示的体验撰写了不限定内容的报告。来自24名中度至高度受暗示性受试者的这些报告样本由18名催眠领域的专家进行了评估。专家对受试者不限定内容报告的评分表明：(a)传统催眠诱导产生的意识状态与非催眠放松训练产生的意识状态无法区分；(b)想象训练后对催眠暗示的主观体验与催眠诱导后的主观体验无法区分；(c)受暗示性与专家评估的意识状态无关。
