Cox B, Skegg D C
Hugh Adam Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1992 Aug;46(4):373-7. doi: 10.1136/jech.46.4.373.
The aim was to estimate the likely burden of cervical cancer in New Zealand over the next two decades, according to whether cervical screening services are made more effective.
The study was based on national mortality and incidence data for the periods 1954-87 and 1954-86, respectively. An age-period-cohort model was used to estimate the contributions of age, time period, and birth cohort effects to the occurrence of cervical cancer. Using age specific estimates of the future female population of New Zealand, projections of cervical cancer mortality and incidence until the year 2008 were derived from the model. Projections were made assuming either that screening services will not be improved, or that an immediate improvement in the organisation of screening will lead to a decline in period effects for incidence of 15% per five year time period (with a slightly delayed effect on mortality). It was also assumed either that the risk in new birth cohorts will be similar to that in recent cohorts, or that their risk will be halved as a result of changes in sexual behaviour (due to education about AIDS or other factors). Combining these assumptions produced four sets of estimates, reflecting a range of possible scenarios.
Both the data used and the projections obtained related to the entire population of New Zealand women.
For both mortality and incidence, projections were made of age specific rates, cumulative rates, and absolute numbers of deaths or new cases. With the first assumption about new birth cohorts, it was estimated that both mortality and incidence rates will increase if screening services are are not improved. In absolute terms, the present 100 deaths per year could increase to about 148 deaths per year, while there could be a much larger increase in incidence from 235 per year to about 440 per year). With improved screening, there could be a reduction in age specific mortality rates and a modest decline in the number of deaths, while a reduction in incidence rates would be accompanied by about the same number of new cases as at present. In comparison with improvements in screening, changes in the underlying risk in new birth cohorts would have much smaller effects on the occurrence of cervical cancer over the next two decades.
Plausible improvements in cervical screening are likely to be accompanied by only small changes in the burden of cervical cancer over the next two decades. If screening services are not improved, however, there will be striking increases in both mortality and incidence.
根据宫颈癌筛查服务是否更有效,估算未来二十年新西兰宫颈癌可能的负担。
该研究分别基于1954 - 1987年和1954 - 1986年的全国死亡率和发病率数据。采用年龄 - 时期 - 队列模型来估算年龄、时期和出生队列效应在宫颈癌发生中的作用。利用新西兰未来女性人口的年龄特异性估计值,从该模型得出直至2008年宫颈癌死亡率和发病率的预测值。预测时假设要么筛查服务不会改善,要么筛查组织立即改善会导致发病率的时期效应每五年下降15%(对死亡率的影响稍有延迟)。还假设要么新出生队列的风险与近期队列相似,要么由于性行为改变(因艾滋病教育或其他因素)其风险减半。综合这些假设得出四组估计值,反映一系列可能的情况。
所使用的数据和获得的预测均与新西兰全体女性人口有关。
对于死亡率和发病率,均对年龄特异性率、累积率以及死亡或新发病例的绝对数进行了预测。基于对新出生队列的第一个假设,如果筛查服务不改善,死亡率和发病率预计都会上升。从绝对数来看,目前每年100例死亡可能增至约每年148例死亡,而发病率可能从每年235例大幅增至约每年440例。筛查改善后,年龄特异性死亡率可能降低,死亡人数适度下降,而发病率降低的同时新发病例数与目前大致相同。与筛查改善相比,新出生队列潜在风险的变化在未来二十年对宫颈癌发生的影响要小得多。
未来二十年,宫颈癌筛查的合理改善可能只会使宫颈癌负担发生微小变化。然而,如果筛查服务不改善,死亡率和发病率将显著上升。