Sakata Y, Sawada Y, Kuroe K, Nakaji S, Takami H, Tsushima K, Saito S, Ogasawara H, Shinagawa H, Soma N
Aomori Prefectural Hospital.
Jpn J Antibiot. 1992 Aug;45(8):1009-15.
A randomized controlled study was conducted to compare effects of imipenem (IPM) (1.0-1.5 g/day) with those of aztreonam (AZT) (4 g/day) +lincomycin (LCM) (1,200-2,400 mg/day) in patients with malignant tumors or hematological diseases and severe infections. A total of 95 patients entered the study between October 1989 and March 1991. Forty-seven patients were treated with IPM and the remaining 48 patients were given AZT+LCM. No statistically significant differences existed in age, sex or underlying diseases between the 2 groups. Overall, the clinical cure rate of the IPM group was 53%; This was significantly higher than the 31% cure rate obtained in the AZT+LCM group (P less than 0.05). The difference was significant in patients whose granulocyte counts were less than 1,000/microliters, but not in those whose granulocyte counts were 1,000/microliters or higher. Side effects were observed in 5 patients given IPM and one given AZT+LCM. In conclusion, no significant differences appeared to exist regarding clinical efficacy and safety between the 2 treatment regimens.
进行了一项随机对照研究,以比较亚胺培南(IPM)(1.0 - 1.5克/天)与氨曲南(AZT)(4克/天)+林可霉素(LCM)(1200 - 2400毫克/天)对患有恶性肿瘤或血液系统疾病且伴有严重感染患者的疗效。1989年10月至1991年3月期间共有95例患者进入该研究。47例患者接受IPM治疗,其余48例患者接受AZT + LCM治疗。两组患者在年龄、性别或基础疾病方面无统计学显著差异。总体而言,IPM组的临床治愈率为53%;这显著高于AZT + LCM组31%的治愈率(P小于0.05)。在粒细胞计数低于1000/微升的患者中差异显著,但在粒细胞计数为1000/微升或更高的患者中差异不显著。接受IPM治疗的5例患者和接受AZT + LCM治疗的1例患者出现了副作用。总之,两种治疗方案在临床疗效和安全性方面似乎没有显著差异。