• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

亚胺培南/西司他丁与氨曲南和克林霉素联合用药治疗腹腔内感染的比较。

Comparison of imipenem/cilastatin with the combination of aztreonam and clindamycin in the treatment of intra-abdominal infections.

作者信息

de Groot H G, Hustinx P A, Lampe A S, Oosterwijk W M

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Leyenburg Municipal Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Antimicrob Chemother. 1993 Sep;32(3):491-500. doi: 10.1093/jac/32.3.491.

DOI:10.1093/jac/32.3.491
PMID:8262872
Abstract

The clinical safety and efficacy of imipenem/cilastatin in the treatment of intra-abdominal infections was compared with the combination of aztreonam and clindamycin in a randomized prospective trial. The severity of illness was determined by means of the Apache II score and a fixed outcome reporting scheme was used. One hundred and four patients were entered into the study, of whom 80 were evaluable. Forty-two patients were treated with imipenem/cilastatin (500 + 500 mg qds) and 38 with aztreonam (600 tds) and clindamycin (1000 mg tds). The study groups were comparable for age and sex. The imipenem/cilastatin group differed from the aztreonam and clindamycin group in having significantly more patients with the diagnosis of acute appendicitis (P < 0.01) and a significantly lower mean Apache score (P < 0.05). The predominate microorganisms isolated in both groups were Escherichia coli and Bacteroides fragilis. Treatment with imipenem/cilastatin proved successful in 71% and failed in 24%, and initial success only was seen in 5%. The numbers in the group treated with aztreonam and clindamycin were 64%, 29% and 7% respectively. Severity of illness, as measured by Apache II score, had no influence on the study outcome. Imipenem/cilastatin as well as the combination of aztreonam and clindamycin were effective in the treatment of abdominal infections and no major adverse reactions were seen.

摘要

在一项随机前瞻性试验中,对亚胺培南/西司他丁治疗腹腔内感染的临床安全性和有效性与氨曲南和克林霉素的联合用药进行了比较。通过急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统(Apache II)来确定疾病的严重程度,并采用固定的结果报告方案。104例患者进入该研究,其中80例可进行评估。42例患者接受亚胺培南/西司他丁治疗(500 + 500毫克,每日四次),38例患者接受氨曲南(600毫克,每日三次)和克林霉素(1000毫克,每日三次)治疗。研究组在年龄和性别方面具有可比性。亚胺培南/西司他丁组与氨曲南和克林霉素组的不同之处在于,诊断为急性阑尾炎的患者明显更多(P < 0.01),且平均Apache评分显著更低(P < 0.05)。两组中分离出的主要微生物均为大肠杆菌和脆弱拟杆菌。亚胺培南/西司他丁治疗成功的比例为71%,失败的比例为24%,仅初次治疗成功的比例为5%。氨曲南和克林霉素治疗组的相应比例分别为64%、29%和7%。以Apache II评分衡量的疾病严重程度对研究结果没有影响。亚胺培南/西司他丁以及氨曲南和克林霉素的联合用药在治疗腹腔感染方面均有效,且未观察到重大不良反应。

相似文献

1
Comparison of imipenem/cilastatin with the combination of aztreonam and clindamycin in the treatment of intra-abdominal infections.亚胺培南/西司他丁与氨曲南和克林霉素联合用药治疗腹腔内感染的比较。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1993 Sep;32(3):491-500. doi: 10.1093/jac/32.3.491.
2
Randomized comparative trial of imipenem/cilastatin versus aminoglycoside plus amoxycillin plus clindamycin in the treatment of severe intra- and post-operative infections.亚胺培南/西司他丁与氨基糖苷类加阿莫西林加克林霉素治疗严重手术中和术后感染的随机对照试验
Drugs Exp Clin Res. 1993;19(5):223-7.
3
Meropenem versus imipenem/cilastatin in the treatment of intra-abdominal infections.美罗培南与亚胺培南/西司他丁治疗腹腔内感染的比较
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1995 Jan;35(1):139-48. doi: 10.1093/jac/35.1.139.
4
Randomized trial of imipenem-cilastatin versus gentamicin plus clindamycin in the treatment of polymicrobial infections.亚胺培南-西司他丁与庆大霉素加克林霉素治疗混合感染的随机试验
Pharmacotherapy. 1988;8(6):315-8. doi: 10.1002/j.1875-9114.1988.tb04089.x.
5
A randomized multicenter trial of piperacillin/tazobactam versus imipenem/cilastatin in the treatment of severe intra-abdominal infections. Swedish Study Group.哌拉西林/他唑巴坦与亚胺培南/西司他丁治疗严重腹腔内感染的随机多中心试验。瑞典研究小组。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1993 Jan;31 Suppl A:79-85. doi: 10.1093/jac/31.suppl_a.79.
6
Results of a multicenter trial comparing imipenem/cilastatin to tobramycin/clindamycin for intra-abdominal infections.一项比较亚胺培南/西司他丁与妥布霉素/克林霉素治疗腹腔内感染的多中心试验结果。
Ann Surg. 1990 Nov;212(5):581-91. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199011000-00004.
7
Efficacy of two comparative antibiotic regimens in the treatment of serious intra-abdominal infections: results of a multicenter study.两种对比性抗生素治疗方案在治疗严重腹腔内感染中的疗效:一项多中心研究结果
Clin Ther. 1992 Jan-Feb;14(1):97-109.
8
Biapenem versus imipenem/cilastatin in the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections: report from a Swedish Study Group.比阿培南与亚胺培南/西司他丁治疗复杂性腹腔内感染:瑞典研究小组的报告
Scand J Infect Dis. 1996;28(5):507-12. doi: 10.3109/00365549609037949.
9
Piperacillin-tazobactam versus imipenem-cilastatin for treatment of intra-abdominal infections.哌拉西林-他唑巴坦与亚胺培南-西司他丁治疗腹腔内感染的比较。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1992 Dec;36(12):2766-73. doi: 10.1128/AAC.36.12.2766.
10
A comparison of imipenem/cilastatin with the combination of cefuroxime and metronidazole in the treatment of intra-abdominal infections.
Scand J Infect Dis. 1996;28(5):513-8. doi: 10.3109/00365549609037950.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcomes of Beta-Lactam Allergic and Non-Beta-Lactam Allergic Patients with Intra-Abdominal Infection: A Case-Control Study.β-内酰胺类过敏和非β-内酰胺类过敏的腹腔内感染患者的结局:一项病例对照研究。
Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 Dec 9;11(12):1786. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11121786.
2
Carbapenems vs β-Lactam Monotherapy or Combination Therapy for the Treatment of Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.碳青霉烯类药物与β-内酰胺类单药治疗或联合治疗复杂性腹腔内感染:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2019 Sep 9;6(10):ofz394. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofz394. eCollection 2019 Oct.
3
Canadian practice guidelines for surgical intra-abdominal infections.
加拿大外科腹腔内感染诊疗指南
Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2010 Spring;21(1):11-37. doi: 10.1155/2010/580340.
4
Antibiotic regimens for secondary peritonitis of gastrointestinal origin in adults.成人胃肠道源性继发性腹膜炎的抗生素治疗方案
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Apr 18;2005(2):CD004539. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004539.pub2.
5
Cost efficacy of tazobactam/piperacillin versus imipenem/cilastatin in the treatment of intra-abdominal infection.他唑巴坦/哌拉西林与亚胺培南/西司他丁治疗腹腔内感染的成本效益
Pharmacoeconomics. 2001 Jan;19(1):79-94. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200119010-00006.
6
Use of newer quinolones for the treatment of intraabdominal infections: focus on clinafloxacin.新型喹诺酮类药物在腹腔内感染治疗中的应用:聚焦于克林沙星
Infection. 1999 May-Jun;27(3):166-72. doi: 10.1007/BF02561522.
7
Monobactams and carbapenems for treatment of intraabdominal infections.用于治疗腹腔内感染的单环β-内酰胺类抗生素和碳青霉烯类抗生素。
Infection. 1999 Mar-Apr;27(2):136-47. doi: 10.1007/BF02560517.
8
Imipenem/cilastatin: an update of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetics and therapeutic efficacy in the treatment of serious infections.亚胺培南/西司他丁:其抗菌活性、药代动力学及治疗严重感染疗效的最新进展
Drugs. 1996 Jan;51(1):99-136. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199651010-00008.