Bishop M P, Simpson G M, Dunnett C W, Kiltie H
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1977 Jan 31;51(2):107-15. doi: 10.1007/BF00431725.
A combined analysis of data from 11 controlled studies of loxapine versus either chlorpromazine or trifluoperazine in acute schizophrenia (5 studies) and chronic schizophrenia (6 studies) showed statistically significant superiority of loxapine on several items and factors of standardized psychiatric rating scales. Upon review of these findings, it was observed that the rating scale symptoms for which loxapine appeared superior to the reference compounds could, in the main, be considered a broad paranoid "cluster". The data were then reanalyzed to detect possible differences in efficacy of loxapine versus the reference compounds in those patients with a clinical diagnosis of schizophrenia, paranoid type and in those patients of any diagnostic subtype other than paranoid. Results of these analyses demonstrated clear superiority of loxapine in paranoid schizophrenic patients; nonparanoid patients responded at least equally as well to loxapine as to the reference compounds. Findings could not be attributed to inadequate dosages of the references compounds or inequality of treatment groups at baseline.
对11项对照研究的数据进行综合分析,这些研究比较了洛沙平与氯丙嗪或三氟拉嗪在急性精神分裂症(5项研究)和慢性精神分裂症(6项研究)中的疗效。结果显示,在标准化精神病评定量表的几个项目和因素上,洛沙平具有统计学上的显著优势。在审查这些结果时发现,洛沙平似乎优于对照化合物的评定量表症状,主要可被视为广泛的偏执“集群”。然后对数据进行重新分析,以检测洛沙平与对照化合物在临床诊断为偏执型精神分裂症的患者以及除偏执型以外的任何诊断亚型的患者中的疗效差异。这些分析结果表明,洛沙平在偏执型精神分裂症患者中具有明显优势;非偏执型患者对洛沙平的反应至少与对照化合物一样好。研究结果不能归因于对照化合物剂量不足或基线时治疗组不平等。