Problems with employer-provided health insurance--the Employee Retirement Income Security Act and health care reform.
作者信息
Mariner W K
机构信息
Boston University Schools of Public Health and Medicine, MA 02118.
出版信息
N Engl J Med. 1992 Dec 3;327(23):1682-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199212033272312.
PMID:1435904
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Problems with employer-provided health insurance--the Employee Retirement Income Security Act and health care reform.雇主提供的医疗保险问题——《雇员退休收入保障法》与医疗改革
N Engl J Med. 1992 Dec 3;327(23):1682-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199212033272312.
2
CalPERS: a model for health care reform?加州公务员退休基金：医疗改革的典范？
Bus Health. 1993 Jun;11(7):45, 48, 50 passim.
3
Postretirement healthcare benefit rules require careful study.退休后医疗福利规则需要仔细研究。
Healthc Financ Manage. 1994 Mar;48(3):66-8, 70.
4
Pension tension: very few states hold all the assets they should for future retirement and health care benefits.
State Legis. 2008 May;34(5):12-5.
5
Up against ERISA.
Natl J (Wash). 1995 Feb 11;27(6):349-52.
6
7
Coping with the costs of retiree health benefits.
NCSL Legisbrief. 2007 Aug-Sep;15(31):1-2.
8
9
The limits of insurance reform.保险改革的局限
Bus Health. 1995 Apr;13(4):85.
10
Retiree health benefits in the United States: a strategic critical management review.美国退休人员的健康福利：一项战略批判性管理综述。
Benefits Q. 1997;13(2):29-35.
引用本文的文献
1
Liability for managed care decisions: the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) and the uneven playing field.管理式医疗决策的责任：《雇员退休收入保障法》（ERISA）与不公平的竞争环境。
Am J Public Health. 1996 Jun;86(6):863-9. doi: 10.2105/ajph.86.6.863.
2
Patients' rights to care under Clinton's Health Security Act: the structure of reform.克林顿《健康保障法案》下患者的医疗护理权：改革架构
Am J Public Health. 1994 Aug;84(8):1330-5. doi: 10.2105/ajph.84.8.1330.
Zotero 插件