• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

克林顿《健康保障法案》下患者的医疗护理权:改革架构

Patients' rights to care under Clinton's Health Security Act: the structure of reform.

作者信息

Mariner W K

机构信息

School of Public Health, Boston University, MA 02118-2394.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 1994 Aug;84(8):1330-5. doi: 10.2105/ajph.84.8.1330.

DOI:10.2105/ajph.84.8.1330
PMID:8059899
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1615447/
Abstract

Like most reform proposals, President Clinton's proposed Health Security Act offers universal access to care but does not significantly alter the nature of patients' legal rights to services. The act would create a system of delegated federal regulation in which the states would act like federal administrative agencies to carry out reform. To achieve uniform, universal coverage, the act would establish a form of mandatory health insurance, with federal law controlling the minimum services to which everyone would be entitled. Because there is no constitutionally protected right to health care and no independent constitutional standard for judging what insurance benefits are appropriate, the federal government would retain considerable freedom to decide what services would and would not be covered. If specific benefits are necessary for patients, they will have to be stated in the legislation that produces reform.

摘要

与大多数改革提案一样,克林顿总统提议的《健康保障法案》提供了普遍的医疗服务,但并未显著改变患者获得服务的法定权利的性质。该法案将建立一个委托联邦监管体系,各州将像联邦行政机构一样行事以实施改革。为实现统一的全民医保覆盖,该法案将建立一种强制性医疗保险形式,由联邦法律控制每个人有权享受的最低服务。由于宪法没有保护医疗保健的权利,也没有独立的宪法标准来判断哪些保险福利是合适的,联邦政府将保留相当大的自由来决定哪些服务将被涵盖,哪些不会。如果患者需要特定的福利,它们将必须在产生改革的立法中予以说明。

相似文献

1
Patients' rights to care under Clinton's Health Security Act: the structure of reform.克林顿《健康保障法案》下患者的医疗护理权:改革架构
Am J Public Health. 1994 Aug;84(8):1330-5. doi: 10.2105/ajph.84.8.1330.
2
Patients' rights after health care reform: who decides what is medically necessary?医疗改革后的患者权利:谁来决定什么是医疗必需的?
Am J Public Health. 1994 Sep;84(9):1515-20. doi: 10.2105/ajph.84.9.1515.
3
President Clinton's Health Security Act: a financial perspective.克林顿总统的《健康保障法案》:财政视角
Health Care Manag. 1994 Aug;1(1):35-43.
4
Prospects for Health Care Reform in the U.S. Senate.美国参议院医疗保健改革的前景
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jun 29;376(26):2501-2503. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1706433. Epub 2017 May 31.
5
Pro & con. State suits against health reform are well grounded in law--and pose serious challenges.正反观点。州政府对医改提起的诉讼在法律上有充分依据,并对医改构成严重挑战。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Jun;29(6):1229-33. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0449.
6
Pro & con. State lawsuits won't succeed in overturning the individual mandate.赞成与反对:州法院诉讼无法成功推翻个人强制参保令。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Jun;29(6):1225-8. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0404.
7
Local television news coverage of President Clinton's introduction of the Health Security Act.地方电视台对克林顿总统提出《健康保障法案》的新闻报道。
JAMA. 1996 Apr 17;275(15):1201-5.
8
Patients' rights proposals: the insurers' perspective.
JAMA. 1999 Mar 3;281(9):858.
9
New roles for states in health reform implementation.国家在医改实施中的新角色。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Jun;29(6):1178-82. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0448.
10
Implementing insurance market reforms under the federal health reform law.实施联邦医改法案下的保险市场改革。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Jun;29(6):1152-7. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0444.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of tobacco industry and other corporations in the defeat of the 1994 Clinton health care plan.烟草行业及其他公司对1994年克林顿医疗保健计划失败的影响。
BMC Public Health. 2017 Jun 21;17(1):591. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4501-7.
2
Patients' rights after health care reform: who decides what is medically necessary?医疗改革后的患者权利:谁来决定什么是医疗必需的?
Am J Public Health. 1994 Sep;84(9):1515-20. doi: 10.2105/ajph.84.9.1515.

本文引用的文献

1
Equitable access to biomedical advances: getting beyond the rights impasse.公平获取生物医学进展:突破权利僵局
Conn Law Rev. 1989 Spring;21(3):571-603.
2
The right to health care in the United States.美国的医疗保健权。
Ann Health Law. 1993;2:161-93.
3
The American Health Security Act. A single-payer proposal.《美国健康保障法案》。一项单一支付者提案。
N Engl J Med. 1993 May 20;328(20):1489-93. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199305203282013.
4
Detention of HIV-positive Haitians at Guantánamo. Human rights and medical care.关塔那摩对艾滋病毒呈阳性的海地人的拘留。人权与医疗护理。
N Engl J Med. 1993 Aug 19;329(8):589-92. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199308193290826.
5
Access to health care and equal protection of the law: the need for a new heightened scrutiny.获得医疗保健与法律的平等保护:对新的严格审查的需求。
Am J Law Med. 1986;12(3-4):345-80.
6
The deteriorating administrative efficiency of the U.S. health care system.美国医疗保健系统日益恶化的行政效率。
N Engl J Med. 1991 May 2;324(18):1253-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199105023241805.
7
Mum's the word: the Supreme Court and family planning.守口如瓶:最高法院与计划生育
Am J Public Health. 1992 Feb;82(2):296-301. doi: 10.2105/ajph.82.2.296.
8
Problems with employer-provided health insurance--the Employee Retirement Income Security Act and health care reform.雇主提供的医疗保险问题——《雇员退休收入保障法》与医疗改革
N Engl J Med. 1992 Dec 3;327(23):1682-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199212033272312.