Kopchia K L, Altman H J, Commissaris R L
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy & AHP, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48202.
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1992 Oct;43(2):453-61. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(92)90176-g.
The effects of lesions of the central nucleus of the amygdala on anxiety-like behaviors in the rat were determined using two animal models, the conditioned suppression of drinking (CSD) and defensive burying paradigms. For CSD conflict testing, water-restricted rats were trained to drink water from a tube that was occasionally electrified (0.25 mA); electrification was signaled by a tone. CSD test sessions were 10 min in duration and were conducted 4 days per week. After at least 3 weeks of conflict testing, both punished (30-40 shocks per session) and unpunished (10-12 ml water per session) responding had stabilized. Subjects then received bilateral electrolytic lesions of the central nucleus of the amygdala or sham lesions. After a 1-week recovery period, CSD conflict testing was reinstated and continued for 20 weeks. Amygdaloid-lesioned subjects accepted significantly more shocks than did sham controls. In addition, acute challenges with the benzodiazepine chlordiazepoxide (2.5-10 mg/kg, IP, 30-min pretreatment), the barbiturate phenobarbital (20 mg/kg, IP, 10-min pretreatment), and carbamazepine (10 mg/kg, IP, 10-min pretreatment) produced an increase in punished responding in both amygdaloid-lesioned and sham-treated subjects. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA)-based adjusted means for the change in shocks received were not significantly different between the two groups. Following completion of the CSD studies, subjects were tested in the defensive burying paradigm. Although there was no significant difference between lesioned and sham-treated subjects on the percent of animals that exhibited burying, subjects with lesions of the central nucleus of the amygdala exhibited a significantly greater latency to initiate defensive burying.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
利用两种动物模型,即饮水条件性抑制(CSD)和防御性埋土范式,确定了杏仁核中央核损伤对大鼠焦虑样行为的影响。对于CSD冲突测试,对限水大鼠进行训练,使其从偶尔通电(0.25 mA)的管子中饮水;通电由一个音调发出信号。CSD测试时段持续10分钟,每周进行4天。经过至少3周的冲突测试后,受惩罚(每次30 - 40次电击)和未受惩罚(每次10 - 12毫升水)的反应均已稳定。然后,对实验对象进行杏仁核中央核的双侧电解损伤或假损伤。经过1周的恢复期后,恢复CSD冲突测试并持续20周。杏仁核损伤的实验对象比假手术对照组接受的电击明显更多。此外,用苯二氮䓬类药物氯氮䓬(2.5 - 10毫克/千克,腹腔注射,30分钟预处理)、巴比妥类药物苯巴比妥(20毫克/千克,腹腔注射,10分钟预处理)和卡马西平(10毫克/千克,腹腔注射,10分钟预处理)进行急性刺激,在杏仁核损伤和假手术处理的实验对象中均使受惩罚反应增加。基于协方差分析(ANCOVA)的接受电击变化的调整均值在两组之间无显著差异。在CSD研究完成后,对实验对象进行防御性埋土范式测试。虽然在表现出埋土行为的动物百分比上,损伤组和假手术处理组之间没有显著差异,但杏仁核中央核损伤的实验对象开始防御性埋土的潜伏期明显更长。(摘要截短至250字)