Aupperle Robin L, Melrose Andrew J, Francisco Alex, Paulus Martin P, Stein Murray B
Department of Psychiatry, University of California - San Diego, La Jolla, California; Psychiatry Service, VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, California; Department of Psychology, University of Missouri - Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri.
Hum Brain Mapp. 2015 Feb;36(2):449-62. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22639. Epub 2014 Sep 15.
Animal approach-avoidance conflict paradigms have been used extensively to operationalize anxiety, quantify the effects of anxiolytic agents, and probe the neural basis of fear and anxiety. Results from human neuroimaging studies support that a frontal-striatal-amygdala neural circuitry is important for approach-avoidance learning. However, the neural basis of decision-making is much less clear in this context. Thus, we combined a recently developed human approach-avoidance paradigm with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to identify neural substrates underlying approach-avoidance conflict decision-making. Fifteen healthy adults completed the approach-avoidance conflict (AAC) paradigm during fMRI. Analyses of variance were used to compare conflict to nonconflict (avoid-threat and approach-reward) conditions and to compare level of reward points offered during the decision phase. Trial-by-trial amplitude modulation analyses were used to delineate brain areas underlying decision-making in the context of approach/avoidance behavior. Conflict trials as compared to the nonconflict trials elicited greater activation within bilateral anterior cingulate cortex, anterior insula, and caudate, as well as right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (PFC). Right caudate and lateral PFC activation was modulated by level of reward offered. Individuals who showed greater caudate activation exhibited less approach behavior. On a trial-by-trial basis, greater right lateral PFC activation related to less approach behavior. Taken together, results suggest that the degree of activation within prefrontal-striatal-insula circuitry determines the degree of approach versus avoidance decision-making. Moreover, the degree of caudate and lateral PFC activation related to individual differences in approach-avoidance decision-making. Therefore, the approach-avoidance conflict paradigm is ideally suited to probe anxiety-related processing differences during approach-avoidance decision-making.
动物趋近-回避冲突范式已被广泛用于将焦虑操作化、量化抗焦虑药物的效果以及探究恐惧和焦虑的神经基础。人类神经影像学研究结果支持额叶-纹状体-杏仁核神经回路对趋近-回避学习很重要。然而,在这种情况下,决策的神经基础尚不清楚得多。因此,我们将最近开发的人类趋近-回避范式与功能磁共振成像(fMRI)相结合,以识别趋近-回避冲突决策背后的神经基质。15名健康成年人在fMRI期间完成了趋近-回避冲突(AAC)范式。方差分析用于比较冲突与非冲突(避免威胁和趋近奖励)条件,并比较决策阶段提供的奖励点数水平。逐次试验的振幅调制分析用于描绘趋近/回避行为背景下决策背后的脑区。与非冲突试验相比,冲突试验在双侧前扣带回皮层、前岛叶和尾状核以及右侧背外侧前额叶皮层(PFC)内引发了更大的激活。右侧尾状核和外侧PFC的激活受提供的奖励水平调制。尾状核激活程度较高的个体表现出较少的趋近行为。在逐次试验的基础上,右侧外侧PFC激活程度较高与趋近行为较少相关。综合来看,结果表明前额叶-纹状体-岛叶回路内的激活程度决定了趋近与回避决策的程度。此外,尾状核和外侧PFC的激活程度与趋近-回避决策中的个体差异有关。因此,趋近-回避冲突范式非常适合探究趋近-回避决策过程中与焦虑相关的加工差异。