HOLT L B, BARNES J M, BOUSFIELD G, SPILLER V, CROARKE F
Bull World Health Organ. 1959;20(6):1121-32.
Parallel dose-response experiments were carried out in infants and guinea-pigs employing mixed antigens, e.g., diphtheria formoltoxoid (plain) mixed with H. pertussis vaccine, and with H. pertussis vaccine and tetanus toxoid (plain).It is found that the slopes of the dose-response regression lines, particularly in respect of the diphtheria antitoxin responses, are so greatly different in the two species that the guinea-pig cannot be used as a test-animal for response in children and that the concept of "units of antigenicity" receives no practical support.Since the adjuvant effect of pertussis vaccine on formol-toxoid appears to be inconstant, it is suggested that this property be regarded solely as a "bonus" to the intrinsic antigenic activity of the toxoid and that, for purposes of laboratory control of such mixed antigens, the toxoids should be tested against the International Toxoids (plain) alone, i.e., not mixed.
在婴儿和豚鼠身上进行了平行剂量反应实验,使用混合抗原,例如,白喉甲醛类毒素(普通)与百日咳疫苗混合,以及与百日咳疫苗和破伤风类毒素(普通)混合。结果发现,两种物种的剂量反应回归线斜率差异极大,尤其是在白喉抗毒素反应方面,以至于豚鼠不能用作儿童反应的试验动物,而且“抗原性单位”的概念也没有得到实际支持。由于百日咳疫苗对甲醛类毒素的佐剂作用似乎不稳定,建议仅将此特性视为类毒素固有抗原活性的“额外好处”,并且为了对这种混合抗原进行实验室控制,类毒素应仅与国际类毒素(普通)进行测试,即不混合。