Kullendorff B, Gröndahl K, Rohlin M, Nilsson M
Department of Oral Radiology, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Acta Odontol Scand. 1992 Oct;50(5):259-67. doi: 10.3109/00016359209012771.
Subtraction and conventional radiography were evaluated for their diagnostic potential to assess interradicular bone lesions in the mandibular premolar region. Both conventional radiographs and subtraction images were interpreted by 10 observers. The receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) technique was used to compare the two techniques. The diagnostic validity was higher for the subtraction technique, both for lesions confined to cancellous bone and for lesions including the cortical bone, than for the conventional technique. For bone defects confined to cancellous bone the diagnostic accuracy was lower than those reported from periapical bone lesions irrespective of whether subtraction or conventional radiography was used. We conclude that subtraction radiography improves the detectability of bone lesions, shallow ones in particular. Lesions in the interradicular bone are more difficult to detect than those in the periapical bone.
对减法成像和传统放射成像评估下颌前磨牙区根间骨病变的诊断潜力进行了研究。10名观察者对传统X光片和减法成像图像进行解读。采用受试者操作特征(ROC)技术对两种技术进行比较。对于局限于松质骨的病变以及包括皮质骨的病变,减法成像技术的诊断有效性均高于传统技术。对于局限于松质骨的骨缺损,无论使用减法成像还是传统放射成像,其诊断准确性均低于根尖周骨病变的报道。我们得出结论,减法放射成像提高了骨病变的可检测性,尤其是浅层病变。根间骨病变比根尖周骨病变更难检测。