Mirvis S E, Gens D R, Shanmuganathan K
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore 21201.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1992 Dec;159(6):1217-21. doi: 10.2214/ajr.159.6.1442385.
The accuracy of CT in the detection of injuries of the solid viscera after blunt trauma is well established, but the value of CT in diagnosing bowel rupture resulting from blunt trauma is controversial. This study was conducted to determine the sensitivity of CT in diagnosing posttraumatic bowel rupture.
During a 51-month period, 17 preoperative CT scans were obtained in 16 patients who subsequently had bowel ruptures verified surgically. Both preoperative (prospective) and retrospective CT findings were analyzed in these patients. Retrospective interpretation was made by consensus of two radiologists.
Surgically confirmed bowel ruptures occurred in the duodenum (five), ileum (four), jejunum (four), colon (four), and stomach (two). CT findings considered diagnostic of bowel perforation were detected prospectively on 10 (59%) of 17 scans; these included pneumoperitoneum without prior peritoneal lavage (six), mesenteric, intramural, or retroperitoneal free air (six), or direct visualization of discontinuity of the bowel wall or extravasation of luminal contents (four). Prospective CT findings considered suggestive of bowel rupture were present on five (29%) of the 17 scans; these included intraperitoneal fluid of unknown source (three), thickened (> 4-5 mm) bowel wall (two), gross anterior pararenal fluid without a recognized source (one), and a mesenteric-bowel wall hematoma (one). On two of 17 scans, findings were seen in retrospect only; these included free intraperitoneal blood without a source (findings on a second CT scan were diagnostic) and pneumoperitoneum. CT findings diagnostic or suggestive of bowel injury were detected prospectively on 15 (88%) of 17 scans and were noted in all retrospectively.
CT is sensitive for the diagnosis of bowel rupture resulting from blunt trauma, but careful inspection and technique are required to detect often subtle findings.
CT在检测钝性创伤后实质性脏器损伤方面的准确性已得到充分证实,但CT在诊断钝性创伤所致肠破裂中的价值仍存在争议。本研究旨在确定CT诊断创伤后肠破裂的敏感性。
在51个月的时间里,对16例随后经手术证实有肠破裂的患者进行了17次术前CT扫描。对这些患者的术前(前瞻性)和回顾性CT结果进行了分析。回顾性解读由两位放射科医生共同完成。
手术证实的肠破裂发生在十二指肠(5例)、回肠(4例)、空肠(4例)、结肠(4例)和胃(2例)。在17次扫描中的10次(59%)前瞻性地检测到被认为可诊断肠穿孔的CT表现;这些表现包括未经事先腹腔灌洗的气腹(6例)、肠系膜、壁内或腹膜后游离气体(6例),或直接观察到肠壁连续性中断或腔内内容物外渗(4例)。在17次扫描中的5次(29%)前瞻性地发现了被认为提示肠破裂的CT表现;这些表现包括来源不明的腹腔内液体(3例)、肠壁增厚(>4 - 5mm)(2例)、无明确来源的巨大肾前间隙液体(1例)和肠系膜 - 肠壁血肿(1例)。在17次扫描中的2次,仅在回顾性分析中发现了相关表现;这些表现包括来源不明的腹腔内游离血液(第二次CT扫描的表现具有诊断意义)和气腹。在17次扫描中的15次(88%)前瞻性地检测到了诊断或提示肠损伤的CT表现,所有这些表现在回顾性分析中均被发现。
CT对诊断钝性创伤所致肠破裂具有敏感性,但需要仔细检查和采用相应技术才能检测到常常较为细微的表现。