Suppr超能文献

心肌血运重建术后进行重大择期手术的风险。

Risk of major elective operation after myocardial revascularization.

作者信息

Nielsen J L, Page C P, Mann C, Schwesinger W H, Fountain R L, Grover F L

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio.

出版信息

Am J Surg. 1992 Nov;164(5):423-6. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(05)81173-0.

Abstract

Although an increased surgical risk of ischemic myocardial disease is widely accepted, amelioration of this risk after coronary artery bypass is poorly defined. We compared the outcomes of major elective general and peripheral vascular operations in 181 patients with prior coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with outcomes in an age-, gender-, and procedure-matched group without prior CABG (NOCABG). Despite the perception of a greater operative risk in the CABG patients (more CABG patients in American Society of Anesthesiologists [ASA] class III and fewer in ASA class I, p < 0.001), mortality (1.1% CABG versus 2.8% NOCABG) and morbidity (18.8% CABG versus 18.5% NOCABG) rates in the two groups were not significantly different. For patients who have undergone successful CABG, it appears that: (1) the risk of subsequent elective major general and vascular surgical operations is similar to that of an age-, gender-, and procedure-matched cohort, and (2) the mortality rate after elective operations is low.

摘要

尽管缺血性心肌病手术风险增加已被广泛认可,但冠状动脉搭桥术后该风险的改善情况却鲜有明确界定。我们比较了181例曾接受冠状动脉搭桥术(CABG)的患者进行择期大型普通外科手术和周围血管手术的结果,以及年龄、性别和手术方式匹配的未接受过CABG的患者(NOCABG)的手术结果。尽管人们认为CABG患者的手术风险更高(美国麻醉医师协会[ASA] III级的CABG患者更多,而ASA I级的患者更少,p<0.001),但两组的死亡率(CABG组为1.1%,NOCABG组为2.8%)和发病率(CABG组为18.8%,NOCABG组为18.5%)并无显著差异。对于成功接受CABG的患者而言,似乎:(1)后续择期大型普通外科手术和血管手术的风险与年龄、性别和手术方式匹配的队列相似;(2)择期手术后的死亡率较低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验