Suppr超能文献

心肌血运重建术后进行重大择期手术的风险。

Risk of major elective operation after myocardial revascularization.

作者信息

Nielsen J L, Page C P, Mann C, Schwesinger W H, Fountain R L, Grover F L

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio.

出版信息

Am J Surg. 1992 Nov;164(5):423-6. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(05)81173-0.

Abstract

Although an increased surgical risk of ischemic myocardial disease is widely accepted, amelioration of this risk after coronary artery bypass is poorly defined. We compared the outcomes of major elective general and peripheral vascular operations in 181 patients with prior coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with outcomes in an age-, gender-, and procedure-matched group without prior CABG (NOCABG). Despite the perception of a greater operative risk in the CABG patients (more CABG patients in American Society of Anesthesiologists [ASA] class III and fewer in ASA class I, p < 0.001), mortality (1.1% CABG versus 2.8% NOCABG) and morbidity (18.8% CABG versus 18.5% NOCABG) rates in the two groups were not significantly different. For patients who have undergone successful CABG, it appears that: (1) the risk of subsequent elective major general and vascular surgical operations is similar to that of an age-, gender-, and procedure-matched cohort, and (2) the mortality rate after elective operations is low.

摘要

尽管缺血性心肌病手术风险增加已被广泛认可,但冠状动脉搭桥术后该风险的改善情况却鲜有明确界定。我们比较了181例曾接受冠状动脉搭桥术(CABG)的患者进行择期大型普通外科手术和周围血管手术的结果,以及年龄、性别和手术方式匹配的未接受过CABG的患者(NOCABG)的手术结果。尽管人们认为CABG患者的手术风险更高(美国麻醉医师协会[ASA] III级的CABG患者更多,而ASA I级的患者更少,p<0.001),但两组的死亡率(CABG组为1.1%,NOCABG组为2.8%)和发病率(CABG组为18.8%,NOCABG组为18.5%)并无显著差异。对于成功接受CABG的患者而言,似乎:(1)后续择期大型普通外科手术和血管手术的风险与年龄、性别和手术方式匹配的队列相似;(2)择期手术后的死亡率较低。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验