Czerny Martin, Zimpfer Daniel, Kilo Juliane, Gottardi Roman, Wolner Ernst, Grimm Michael
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Vienna Medical School, Vienna, Austria.
Heart Surg Forum. 2003;6(4):210-5.
Morbidity and mortality rates rise with increasing age in patients undergoing conventional redo coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The aim of this study was to compare our experience of minimal tissue dissection and target vessel revascularization without cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) with the standard procedure of total dissection of the heart and complete revascularization with CPB for a population of elderly patients undergoing elective redo coronary artery CABG.
We retrospectively analyzed morbidity, mortality, and functional status of 47 patients older than 75 years who underwent redo CABG between January 1995 and June 2002. Thirty-one patients underwent redo CABG with CPB, and 16 patients underwent redo CABG without CPB. Follow-up end points were defined by patient survival, freedom from recurrence of angina (Canadian Cardiovascular Society [CCS] score), freedom from rehospitalizations and reinterventions, and the need for antianginal medication.
There were 2 perioperative deaths (2 in the CPB group versus 0 in the group without CPB; P =.151). Nonfatal myocardial infarction occurred in 3 patients (3 in the CPB group versus 0 in the group without CPB; P =.082). Major adverse cardiac events occurred in 5 patients (5 in the CPB group versus 0 in the group without CPB; P =.058). At the time of follow-up, the mean CCS score of patients who underwent redo CABG with CPB was 1.5 +/- 0.8 and was 1.6 +/- 0.7 for patients who underwent redo CABG without CPB (P =.432). The rates of angina recurrence (16% with CPB versus 13.3% without CPB; P =.243), use of nitrates (8.7% with CPB versus 14.3% without CPB; P =.542), and survival (89% with CPB versus 93% without CPB; P =.238) were very comparable for the two groups.
In this high-risk subgroup of patients, those patients who underwent target vessel revascularization without CPB showed a trend toward a lower rate of major adverse cardiac events, and this procedure seems promising with regard to long-term outcome. Therefore, target vessel revascularization may be offered liberally to elderly patients who are at high risk in surgeries involving complete revascularization with CPB. Further studies are needed to elucidate the long-term outcome of target vessel revascularization for elderly patients undergoing redo CABG.
在接受传统再次冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)的患者中,发病率和死亡率随年龄增长而升高。本研究的目的是比较我们在老年择期再次冠状动脉CABG患者中,采用最小化组织分离和非体外循环(CPB)下目标血管血运重建的经验,与采用心脏完全分离和CPB下完全血运重建的标准手术方法的经验。
我们回顾性分析了1995年1月至2002年6月期间接受再次CABG的47例75岁以上患者的发病率、死亡率和功能状态。31例患者接受了CPB下的再次CABG,16例患者接受了非CPB下的再次CABG。随访终点由患者生存率、无心绞痛复发(加拿大心血管学会[CCS]评分)、无再次住院和再次干预以及抗心绞痛药物需求来定义。
围手术期有2例死亡(CPB组2例,非CPB组0例;P = 0.151)。3例患者发生非致命性心肌梗死(CPB组3例,非CPB组0例;P = 0.082)。5例患者发生主要不良心脏事件(CPB组5例,非CPB组0例;P = 0.058)。在随访时,接受CPB下再次CABG的患者平均CCS评分为1.5±0.8,接受非CPB下再次CABG的患者平均CCS评分为1.6±0.7(P = 0.432)。两组的心绞痛复发率(CPB组为16%,非CPB组为13.3%;P = 0.243)、硝酸盐使用率(CPB组为8.7%,非CPB组为14.3%;P = 0.542)和生存率(CPB组为89%,非CPB组为93%;P = 0.238)非常相近。
在这个高危亚组患者中,接受非CPB下目标血管血运重建的患者主要不良心脏事件发生率有降低趋势,且该手术在长期预后方面似乎很有前景。因此,对于在涉及CPB完全血运重建的手术中处于高风险的老年患者,可以广泛提供目标血管血运重建。需要进一步研究来阐明老年再次CABG患者目标血管血运重建后的长期预后。