Nishikawa T, Inomata S, Igarashi M, Goyagi T, Naito H
Department of Anesthesiology, University of Tsukuba, Japan.
Anesth Analg. 1992 Dec;75(6):885-8. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199212000-00004.
Because isoflurane maintains hepatic blood flow at higher flows than halothane, we proposed that the elimination of lidocaine would be different between these two volatile anesthetics. The plasma lidocaine concentrations were determined in 14 female patients undergoing epidural blockade plus isoflurane anesthesia and compared with those obtained during halothane anesthesia for lower abdominal surgery. General anesthesia was maintained with isoflurane (0.46% +/- 0.04% [mean +/- SE] inspired, n = 7) or halothane (0.48% +/- 0.05% inspired, n = 7) and 67% nitrous oxide in oxygen. All patients received 2% lidocaine solution, 10 mL as a bolus dose and continuous administration at a rate of 10 mL/h, through the epidural catheter. The plasma lidocaine concentrations over 180 min after the epidural injection in patients receiving isoflurane were similar to those in patients receiving halothane. The results suggest that low inspired concentrations of isoflurane do not reduce plasma lidocaine concentrations in patients during epidural blockade, compared with halothane.
由于异氟烷在较高流量下能维持肝血流,而氟烷不能,我们推测这两种挥发性麻醉剂对利多卡因的消除作用会有所不同。我们测定了14例接受硬膜外阻滞加异氟烷麻醉的女性患者的血浆利多卡因浓度,并与下腹部手术氟烷麻醉期间测得的浓度进行比较。采用异氟烷(吸入浓度0.46%±0.04%[均值±标准误],n = 7)或氟烷(吸入浓度0.48%±0.05%,n = 7)及67%氧化亚氮-氧气混合气维持全身麻醉。所有患者均通过硬膜外导管接受2%利多卡因溶液,10 mL作为单次推注剂量,并以10 mL/h的速率持续输注。接受异氟烷的患者硬膜外注射后180分钟内的血浆利多卡因浓度与接受氟烷的患者相似。结果表明,与氟烷相比,低吸入浓度的异氟烷不会降低硬膜外阻滞患者的血浆利多卡因浓度。