Burger J, Gochfeld M
Department of Biological Sciences, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey 08855.
Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 1992 Nov;23(4):484-8. doi: 10.1007/BF00203814.
The process of human health risk assessment (HRA) was formalized in 1983 by the National Research Council to include hazard identification, dose-response analyses, exposure assessment and risk characterization. Risk assessment for ecologic endpoints is emerging as a new discipline. Although environmental impact statements have been conducted for many years, ecologists, managers and policy makers are beginning to formalize the process in terms of risk, and are adapting the HRA paradigm to ecological risk assessment (ERA). In this paper it is suggested that the temporal scales of the two processes differ, and that these differences should be incorporated in ecological risk assessment. Even when HRA techniques are applied to a single non-human species there are temporal variations including: (1) different and often variable life spans, (2) unpredictable lengths of lifestages and different metamorphic stages, and (3) indeterminate growth in some species. When these differences are considered for multispecies assemblages, the impact on the food web will result in exposures of differing magnitudes affecting different species. The challenges for ERA include developing general principles for estimating or predicting exposure to critical life stages of the dominant species in an ecosystem, and establishing the appropriate temporal scales for predicting impacts or evaluating outcomes.
1983年,美国国家研究委员会将人类健康风险评估(HRA)流程正式确定为包括危害识别、剂量反应分析、暴露评估和风险表征。生态终点的风险评估正在成为一门新学科。尽管环境影响声明已经开展多年,但生态学家、管理人员和政策制定者正开始从风险角度将该流程正式化,并将HRA范式应用于生态风险评估(ERA)。本文指出,这两个过程的时间尺度不同,这些差异应纳入生态风险评估。即使将HRA技术应用于单个非人类物种,也存在时间变化,包括:(1)不同且往往可变的寿命,(2)不可预测的生命阶段长度和不同的变态阶段,以及(3)某些物种的不确定生长。当考虑这些差异对多物种组合的影响时,对食物网的影响将导致不同程度的暴露,影响不同物种。ERA面临的挑战包括制定用于估计或预测生态系统中优势物种关键生命阶段暴露的一般原则,以及确定用于预测影响或评估结果的适当时间尺度。