Berg K O, Maki B E, Williams J I, Holliday P J, Wood-Dauphinee S L
School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992 Nov;73(11):1073-80.
The objective of this cross-sectional study was to compare scores on the Balance Scale with laboratory measures of postural sway and other clinical measures of balance and mobility. Thirty-one elderly subjects were assessed on the clinical measures and the laboratory tests of postural sway while standing still and in response to pseudorandom movements of the platform. The average correlation between the Balance Scale and the spontaneous sway measures was -.55. It was slightly lower (r = -.38) for the same parameters measured during the pseudorandom tests. There were high correlations between the Balance Scale and the Balance Sub-Scale developed by Tinetti (r = .91), Barthel Mobility sub-scale (r = .67), and timed "Up and Go" (r = -.76). The Balance Scale was the most efficient measure (effect size > 1) to statistically discriminate between subjects according to their use of each type of mobility aide (walker, cane, no aids). These data contribute to existing information on the performance of the Balance Scale and supports the validity of the Balance Scale in this geriatric population.
这项横断面研究的目的是将平衡量表的得分与姿势摆动的实验室测量值以及其他平衡和移动性的临床测量值进行比较。31名老年受试者接受了临床测量以及在静止站立和对平台的伪随机运动做出反应时的姿势摆动实验室测试。平衡量表与自发摆动测量值之间的平均相关性为-0.55。在伪随机测试期间测量的相同参数的相关性略低(r = -0.38)。平衡量表与Tinetti开发的平衡子量表(r = 0.91)、Barthel移动性子量表(r = 0.67)以及定时“起身走”测试(r = -0.76)之间存在高度相关性。平衡量表是根据受试者对每种移动辅助工具(步行器、拐杖、无辅助工具)的使用情况在统计学上区分受试者的最有效测量方法(效应大小>1)。这些数据为关于平衡量表性能的现有信息做出了贡献,并支持了平衡量表在该老年人群中的有效性。