Tulloh B R, Collopy B T
Department of Surgery, Melbourne University, St Vincent's Hospital, Australia.
Aust Clin Rev. 1992;12(3):99-107.
A retrospective review of 279 hospital admissions at two Melbourne hospitals was conducted to develop a method for identifying diagnostic error using the Injury Severity Score (ISS) as a model for clinical audit. Two scores were calculated for each patient, the first according to injuries diagnosed on initial assessment in the Emergency Department and the second according to final, confirmed diagnoses upon discharge from hospital. Diagnostic errors were identified as discrepancies between the initial and final scores. ISS discrepancies were found in 48 cases (17.2%). Some were clinically significant errors of diagnosis while others reflected inaccurate injury description or record keeping. Abdominal injuries were the most frequently missed, followed in decreasing order by spinal, thoracic, extremities (limbs), head/face and external injuries (skin and subcutaneous tissues). The frequency and pattern of injury misdiagnosis concurs with the findings of other studies. The diagnostic error rate was found to increase with injury severity and with the number of anatomic body regions involved. The authors suggest that comparing initial and final ISS provides a convenient mechanism for the audit of early diagnosis in trauma cases.
对墨尔本两家医院的279例住院病例进行了回顾性研究,以开发一种使用损伤严重度评分(ISS)作为临床审计模型来识别诊断错误的方法。为每位患者计算了两个分数,第一个分数是根据急诊科初次评估时诊断出的损伤计算得出,第二个分数是根据出院时最终确诊的诊断计算得出。诊断错误被确定为初始分数和最终分数之间的差异。在48例病例(17.2%)中发现了ISS差异。有些是具有临床意义的诊断错误,而其他则反映了损伤描述或记录保存不准确。腹部损伤是最常被漏诊的,其次依次是脊柱、胸部、四肢、头部/面部和外部损伤(皮肤和皮下组织)。损伤误诊的频率和模式与其他研究结果一致。发现诊断错误率随着损伤严重程度以及涉及的解剖身体部位数量的增加而上升。作者建议,比较初始和最终的ISS为创伤病例的早期诊断审计提供了一种便捷机制。