• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

澳大利亚全科医学研究资金分析。

An analysis of funding for general practice research in Australia.

作者信息

Silagy C A, Schattner P, Baxter R G

机构信息

Department of Community Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria.

出版信息

Aust Fam Physician. 1992 Oct;21(10):1452-60.

PMID:1444972
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To describe the current status of funding for general practice research in Australia.

DESIGN

A descriptive survey analysing funding arrangements of research projects included in a national research database, established by the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Research projects involving, or directly related to, general practice that had commenced in Australia since 1 January, 1989. Responses were specifically sought from all universities, the Family Medicine Programme and the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Extent and source(s) of funding received or requested, or both; relationship of funding received to the following: qualification and affiliations of the principal investigator; submission of the research project towards a higher degree; subject area(s) covered by the research; study design method used; and duration of project.

RESULTS

A total of 237 projects from 130 principal investigators were included in the analysis. Of these, 149 (63%) had been submitted for funding and 98 (66%) had been successful. The amount of funding ranged between $300 and $855,600. The most common source of funding was the General Practice Evaluation Programme. Research contributing towards a higher degree was associated with successfully receiving funding. Other variables, including the study design and study area, were not significantly associated with an increased success of funding.

CONCLUSIONS

The total amount of funds spent on general practice research is still small, relative to the size of the workforce. However, over half of general practice research undertaken in Australia is not submitted for funding. Of the research that is submitted, the success rate of receiving funds is high.

摘要

目的

描述澳大利亚全科医学研究的资金现状。

设计

一项描述性调查,分析澳大利亚皇家全科医师学院建立的国家研究数据库中所包含研究项目的资金安排。

背景与参与者

1989年1月1日以来在澳大利亚启动的涉及全科医学或与之直接相关的研究项目。特别向所有大学、家庭医学项目组以及澳大利亚皇家全科医师学院寻求反馈。

主要观察指标

已获得或申请的资金数额及来源;所获资金与以下因素的关系:首席研究员的资质和所属机构;研究项目是否用于攻读更高学位;研究涵盖的主题领域;所采用的研究设计方法;以及项目持续时间。

结果

分析纳入了来自130位首席研究员的237个项目。其中,149个(63%)已提交资金申请,98个(66%)申请成功。资金数额在300澳元至855,600澳元之间。最常见的资金来源是全科医学评估项目。用于攻读更高学位的研究与成功获得资金相关。其他变量,包括研究设计和研究领域,与资金申请成功率的提高没有显著关联。

结论

相对于劳动力规模而言,用于全科医学研究的资金总额仍然较少。然而,澳大利亚开展的超过半数的全科医学研究未提交资金申请。在提交申请的研究中,获得资金的成功率较高。

相似文献

1
An analysis of funding for general practice research in Australia.澳大利亚全科医学研究资金分析。
Aust Fam Physician. 1992 Oct;21(10):1452-60.
2
Current status of general practice research in Australia. Analysis of a national database.澳大利亚全科医学研究的现状。对一个国家数据库的分析。
Med J Aust. 1992 Jul 20;157(2):108-13.
3
Immunisation initiatives in general practice. Important lessons from division projects.全科医疗中的免疫接种举措。分区项目的重要经验教训。
Aust Fam Physician. 1999 Dec;28(12):1290-7.
4
Randomised trials within the general practice evaluation program. Why so few?全科医疗评估项目中的随机试验。为何如此之少?
Aust Fam Physician. 2001 May;30(5):504-7.
5
An assessment of funding to support rural and remote health research in Australia.对支持澳大利亚农村和偏远地区卫生研究的资金的评估。
Aust J Rural Health. 2000 Oct;8(5):271-9.
6
The researcher development program: how to extend the involvement of Australian general practitioners in research?研究人员发展计划:如何扩大澳大利亚全科医生参与研究的程度?
Rural Remote Health. 2007 Jul-Sep;7(3):776. Epub 2007 Aug 14.
7
Building research capacity in family medicine: evaluation of the Grant Generating Project.培养家庭医学研究能力:资助生成项目评估
J Fam Pract. 2002 Jul;51(7):593.
8
General practice research training: impact of the Australian Registrar Research Workshop on research skills, confidence, interest and involvement of participants, 2002-2006.全科医学研究培训:2002 - 2006年澳大利亚住院医师研究研讨会对参与者研究技能、信心、兴趣及参与度的影响
Fam Pract. 2008 Apr;25(2):119-26. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmn010. Epub 2008 Feb 27.
9
Evaluating Australia's National Medicines Policy using geographical mapping.运用地理映射法评估澳大利亚国家药品政策。
Intern Med J. 2002 Mar;32(3):66-71.
10
Worldwide trends in funding for contraceptive research and evaluation.全球范围内避孕研究与评估的资金投入趋势。
Fam Plann Perspect. 1985 Sep-Oct;17(5):196-207.