Campbell James D, Longo Daniel R
Department of Family and Community Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, 65212, USA.
J Fam Pract. 2002 Jul;51(7):593.
To evaluate the Grant Generating Project (GGP), a program designed to train and assist family medicine researchers to secure funding as part of an overall strategy to increase research capacity in family medicine.
Cross-sectional mail survey.
First- through fourth-year participants in the GGP program starting from 1995. Participants were faculty members of American and Canadian family medicine departments.
We measured cardinal features of primary care quality including first-contact care (accessibility and utilization), longitudinality (strength of affiliation and interpersonal relationship), comprehensiveness (services offered and received), and coordination of care.
Most (18 of 23) GGP participants completed the survey. A total of 58 grants/contracts were submitted by respondents, representing approximately US$19.3 million. Currently, 17 (29%) are pending, representing $10.8 million (including training grants). Given the current track record, $4.8 million additional grants funds could be generated. GGP strengths cited by respondents included an effort to enhance family medicine research; personal attention, guidance, motivation, and feedback from GGP faculty and mentors; development of grant-writing skills; encouragement to attend family medicine meetings; ability to meet and learn from peers; mock study section experience; and the ability to teach, mentor, and encourage others as the GGP experience did for them. Major challenges cited were a variable degree of commitment from mentors, lack of a long-term commitment to participants, and difficulty accommodating the research focus and skill level of participants. In general, most respondents regarded the GGP program as well worth the time and effort invested.
One to 2 years after participating in the program, participants achieved a remarkable track record of grant submissions. Moreover, the GGP program has had a substantial impact on participants; many are now teaching and mentoring others in their department. If sustained, the program will greatly increase the research capacity of the discipline of family medicine.
评估资助生成项目(GGP),该项目旨在培训并协助家庭医学研究人员获得资金,作为提高家庭医学研究能力整体战略的一部分。
横断面邮件调查。
1995年起参加GGP项目的一至四年级参与者。参与者为美国和加拿大家庭医学系的教员。
我们测量了初级保健质量的主要特征,包括首诊服务(可及性和利用率)、连续性(医患关系强度和人际关系)、全面性(提供和接受的服务)以及医疗协调。
大多数(23名中的18名)GGP参与者完成了调查。受访者共提交了58项资助/合同申请,总计约1930万美元。目前,17项(29%)申请正在审批中,涉及金额1080万美元(包括培训资助)。根据目前的进展情况,还可额外获得480万美元的资助资金。受访者提到的GGP优势包括:努力加强家庭医学研究;GGP教员和导师给予的个人关注、指导、激励和反馈;资助申请书撰写技能的提升;鼓励参加家庭医学会议;与同行交流和学习的机会;模拟研究小组经验;以及像GGP经历对他们的帮助那样去教导、指导和鼓励他人的能力。提到的主要挑战包括导师的投入程度不一、对参与者缺乏长期投入,以及难以兼顾参与者的研究重点和技能水平。总体而言,大多数受访者认为GGP项目非常值得投入时间和精力。
参与该项目一到两年后,参与者在资助申请方面取得了显著成绩。此外,GGP项目对参与者产生了重大影响;许多人现在在本部门教导和指导他人。如果该项目持续开展,将极大提高家庭医学学科的研究能力。