Suppr超能文献

用于监测肾移植和肝移植后全血中环孢素的仪器非同位素免疫测定法(荧光偏振免疫测定法和酶增强免疫测定技术)的评估。

Evaluation of instrumental, nonisotopic immunoassays (fluorescence polarization immunoassay and enzyme-multiplied immunoassay technique) for cyclosporine monitoring in whole blood after kidney and liver transplantation.

作者信息

Beutler D, Molteni S, Zeugin T, Thormann W

机构信息

Department of Clinical Pharmacology, University of Bern, Switzerland.

出版信息

Ther Drug Monit. 1992 Oct;14(5):424-32. doi: 10.1097/00007691-199210000-00014.

Abstract

Two new instrumental methods, an enzyme-multiplied immunoassay technique (EMIT) and a fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA), were evaluated for monitoring of cyclosporine (CyA) in whole blood samples of renal and liver transplant patients. They are considered as being specific to the parent drug and they were compared with a specific radioimmunoassay (RIA) and a nonspecific FPIA. The data reveal that the novel procedures provide slightly overestimated CyA levels compared with specific RIA (6-12% for EMIT, 20-25% for FPIA). For both assays, intrarun and interrun reproducibilities were found to be in the 2-8% range. The ease of performance and the possibility of performing approximately 40 assays/h make the two methodologies very attractive for both routine and emergency analyses. These approaches are viewed to be complementary to the only previously available instrumental method, the nonspecific FPIA, which provides three- to fourfold higher CyA levels than those obtained with specific methods. Specific and nonspecific monitoring of CyA levels allowed variations in proportions of metabolites to total CyA and metabolites to be distinguished. A higher percentage and variability of cross-reacting metabolites were found in whole blood samples after liver transplantation compared with those in blood of kidney transplant recipients.

摘要

对两种新的检测方法,即酶倍增免疫测定技术(EMIT)和荧光偏振免疫测定法(FPIA)进行了评估,以监测肾移植和肝移植患者全血样本中的环孢素(CyA)。这两种方法被认为对母体药物具有特异性,并与特异性放射免疫测定法(RIA)和非特异性FPIA进行了比较。数据显示,与特异性RIA相比,这两种新方法所测得的CyA水平略有高估(EMIT高估6 - 12%,FPIA高估20 - 25%)。对于这两种检测方法,批内和批间的重现性均在2 - 8%范围内。操作简便且每小时可进行约40次检测,这使得这两种方法对常规分析和紧急分析都极具吸引力。这些方法被视为是对之前唯一可用的检测方法,即非特异性FPIA的补充,非特异性FPIA所测得的CyA水平比特异性方法高3至4倍。对CyA水平进行特异性和非特异性监测能够区分代谢产物与总CyA以及代谢产物之间比例的差异。与肾移植受者的血液相比,肝移植后全血样本中交叉反应性代谢产物的百分比更高且变异性更大。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验