Suppr超能文献

口服依诺昔酮与安慰剂治疗严重心功能不全的双盲临床及超声心动图研究

[Double-blind clinical and echocardiographic study of oral enoximone versus placebo in severe cardiac insufficiency].

作者信息

Delorme G, Dubourg O, Jondeau G, Beauchet A, Arnal J F, Hardy A, Brun D, Dinanian S, Bock F, Bourdarias J P

机构信息

Service de cardiologie, hôpital Ambroise-Paré, Boulogne.

出版信息

Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 1992 Jul;85(7):1023-9.

PMID:1449335
Abstract

The effect of enoximone was assessed by a randomised double blind trial versus placebo. The clinical status of the patients was evaluated by the NYHA classification and quality of life score. Inotropic state was estimated from the maximum acceleration of aortic and pulmonary blood flow recorded by Doppler echocardiography. Thirty patients with severe cardiac failure, aged 66.4 +/- 14 years, symptomatic despite maximal therapy associating diuretics, digitalis, nitrate derivatives and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, were included. Fifteen patients were given enoximone 100 mg three times a day orally (Group E) and the other 15 were given a placebo (Group P). The NYHA class and quality of life scores were assessed at D0, D4 and D31. Doppler echocardiography and Holter recordings were performed on D0 and D31. The two groups were comparable at D0. Ten patients abandoned the trial, 3 from Group E (including 1 death) and 7 from Group P (including 3 deaths). At D4, 13 patients from Group E and 8 from Group P were clinically improved (p < 0.05). At D31, the clinical state was stable or improved in 10 of the 12 patients in Group E and 6 of the 8 patients in Group P (NS). No secondary effects were severe enough to warrant the withdrawal of treatment: the frequency of ventricular extrasystoles was comparable in the two groups at D0 and D31. At D31 the maximal aortic acceleration had increased by 20% compared with D0 (p < 0.05) and the maximal pulmonary acceleration by 31% (p < 0.05) in Group E. The same parameters showed no significant change in Group P (-6% and +5% respectively).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

通过随机双盲试验对比安慰剂评估依诺昔酮的效果。采用纽约心脏协会(NYHA)分级和生活质量评分评估患者的临床状况。通过多普勒超声心动图记录的主动脉和肺血流最大加速度估算心肌收缩状态。纳入了30例严重心力衰竭患者,年龄66.4±14岁,尽管联合使用利尿剂、洋地黄、硝酸酯类衍生物和血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂进行了最大程度的治疗,但仍有症状。15例患者每天口服3次100毫克依诺昔酮(E组),另外15例给予安慰剂(P组)。在第0天、第4天和第31天评估NYHA分级和生活质量评分。在第0天和第31天进行多普勒超声心动图和动态心电图记录。两组在第0天具有可比性。10例患者退出试验,E组3例(包括1例死亡),P组7例(包括3例死亡)。在第4天,E组13例患者和P组8例患者临床症状改善(p<0.05)。在第31天,E组12例患者中的10例和P组8例患者中的6例临床状态稳定或改善(无显著性差异)。没有严重到需要停药的副作用:两组在第0天和第31天室性早搏的发生率相当。在第31天,E组主动脉最大加速度较第0天增加了20%(p<0.05),肺最大加速度增加了31%(p<0.05)。P组相同参数无显著变化(分别为-6%和+5%)。(摘要截断于250字)

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验